Yesterday, President Bush claimed that Iraqi security forces “primarily led” the assault on the city of Tal Afar. Bush highlighted it as an “especially clear” sign of the progress Iraq security forces were making in Iraq.
The progress of the Iraqi forces is especially clear when the recent anti-terrorist operations in Tal Afar are compared with last year’s assault in Fallujah. In Fallujah, the assault was led by nine coalition battalions made up primarily of United States Marines and Army — with six Iraqi battalions supporting them…This year in Tal Afar, it was a very different story. The assault was primarily led by Iraqi security forces — 11 Iraqi battalions, backed by five coalition battalions providing support.
TIME Magazine reporter Michael Ware, who is embedded with the U.S. troops in Iraq who participated in the Tal Afar battle, appeared on Anderson Cooper yesterday. He said Bush’s description was completely untrue:
I was in that battle from the very beginning to the very end. I was with Iraqi units right there on the front line as they were battling with al Qaeda. They were not leading. They were being led by the U.S. green beret special forces with them.
Sen. John Warner (R-VA) who was also on Anderson Cooper yesterday said “I respect those journalists that embed themselves and I accept as a credible description what you’ve just put forward.”
Full Transcript:
COOPER: You know this is not one of the shows where we take sides. I really try to just look at facts on the ground, and the President in his speech talked about the battle of Tal Afar. And in his speech today, he said that it was led primarily by Iraqi security forces, eleven Iraqi battalions, backed by five coalition battalions providing support. He used this as compared to the battle of Fallujah as an example of how much better the Iraqis are doing. Earlier, I talked to Time Magazine’s Michael Ware, the Baghdad bureau chief who was embedded during the entire battle. I want to play you what he said about the Iraqi units he saw.
WARE: I was in that battle from the very beginning to the very end. I was with Iraqi units right there on the front line as they were battling with al Qaeda. They were not leading. They were being led by the U.S. green beret special forces with them. Green berets who were following an American plan of attack who were advancing with these Iraqi units as and when they were told to do so by the American battle planners. The Iraqis led nothing.
COOPER: Do you think the president was correct in saying that this was an Iraqi victory, that the Iraqis were leading the way?
WARNER: Well, I’ll let the commanders sort that out but I - first I respect those journalists that embed themselves and I accept as a credible description what you’ve just put forward. But you didn’t hear him say they cut and run like they did in Fallujah. You didn’t hear him say that the Iraqis dropped the arms. He said they were fighting. Now it may well have been that the battle plan was drawn up by the coalition forces, probably the U.S. leading.
Contributors
Links
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(896)
-
▼
December
(68)
- The New Year in Taxes - New York TimesThe New York...
- Willie Nelson Markets 'BioWillie' Fuel
- Crooks at the Trough
- Top Ten Myths about Iraq in 2005
- Beyond the imperial presidency
- Bush Hands Bin Laden A Victory
- Power That Bush Can't Just Take
- Bush Causes Whiplash By Saying Bad Intel Made Good...
- Silent Nights on the Gulf Coast - New York TimesTh...
- Vast US effort seen on eavesdropping
- Bush Impeachment Not Out of the Question
- Infidel Non-Christians Will Not Go To Heaven!!!
- I Saw Jackie Mason Kissing Santa Claus
- The Coup is Almost Complete
- Power We Didn't Grant
- Excuses, excuses
- How Far Will Bush Supporters Go?
- Republican Holiday Gift
- And You Say You’re not a Union Man
- Bush's impeachable offense
- Iraq Vote Moves Baghdad Closer to Tehran
- Spy Court Judge Quits In Protest
- Judge Rules Against Pa. Biology Curriculum By
- Even Right Wingers Want Him Impeached For Spying o...
- Present at the Disintegration
- Bush’s Snoopgate
- Impeach the Bastards
- George W. Bush: Emperor or Military Dictator?
- Republicans: FUCK THE POOR
- The President's Men
- Spying on Americans: Did Bush break the law?
- U.S. Plays 'I Spy'
- A Ten-Step Program
- On Hill, Anger and Calls for Hearings Greet News o...
- Everyone had the same intelligence on Iraq? Not ex...
- Dingell's Holiday Jingle
- The Rock Star's Burden - New York TimesThe New Yor...
- Does 30,000 Mean Anything to Bush
- Terminator In Deed
- Dope, dope, dope.....
- Tookie Dies, So Arnold Can Live
- Which is why she's a FOX news regular
- Dictionary of Republicanisms
- a Potemkin Village - New York TimesThe New York Ti...
- Bush Meets St. Peter - New York TimesThe New York ...
- Conspiracy to Torture
- Can Mommy Know Best? - New York TimesThe New York ...
- Republican Values: Train Robbery by Crooks for Cro...
- VERY SAD NEWSThere will be no Nativity Scene in Wa...
- A New Low for Lieberman
- Rumsfeld's Handshake Deal with Saddam
- Mission to be decided
- Playwright Takes a Prize and a Jab at U.S.
- Iceberg? What Iceberg?
- Push the Pedal To the Metal or Get the Hell Out.
- Torturing the Facts - New York TimesThe New York T...
- Fw: Torture: What are the U.S. Obligations to Pre...
- Dick and Don Chew the Fat
- Open and Shut
- The Iraq Index
- Ho Ho Hokum
- Paging Frank Rich! GAO confirms - 2004 Election Wa...
- Bushwhacking the Constitution
- The only way out
- Check out this turn of events....
- The president's season of hope and happiness
- Let's Quit Complaining and Join The Republican Party.
- Embedded TIME Reporter: Bush Lied In Speech Yester...
-
▼
December
(68)
No comments:
Post a Comment