The New York Times
fox/sideways_pf

December 10, 2004
EDITORIAL

Secretary Snow

As the search for someone to replace Treasury Secretary John Snow dragged
on, Republicans close to the White House openly dissed him. Then, on
Wednesday,
the president reappointed Mr. Snow. To justify the surprise decision, a
senior administration official said, "This was no time to send a signal of
uncertainty."

Well, it's no time to send a signal of business as usual, either. The
economic legacy of the first Bush term is dauntingly bad. The stock market
is lower,
despite tax cuts aimed at spurring investment. The dollar is way lower, and
fears of a free fall are mounting daily. The federal budget has swung from
a surplus to a $412 billion deficit, mainly because of misguided and
excessive tax cuts. The deficits in trade and international investment are
at never-before-tested
levels, nearly triple what most economists consider sustainable. Job
creation has been weaker than at any time in modern memory. Incomes are
stagnant,
failing in most months to even keep pace with inflation. And no - count 'em,
zero - policy reversals are on the horizon.

As if that's not bad enough, Mr. Snow's reappointment also sends a
disturbing, though not surprising, message about policy making. Like other
secretaries
in the Bush administration, Mr. Snow's main job has been to promote
policies - not make them. To the extent that this administration has engaged
in making
economic policies (to wit, "tax cuts above all" and "deficits don't
matter"), the policies have come from the president's inner circle.

Mr. Snow, like so many others around President Bush, is nothing more than a
messenger. Congress knows it. The financial markets know it. Our trading
partners
know it. It strains the imagination that the White House couldn't find a
fitting Treasury secretary among the Wall Street mavens, former politicians
and
other professionals who were considered for the post. It's more likely that
none were suited for the real job on offer: cheerleader.

This all bodes ill for the economy. Domestically, the president is committed
to largely replacing Social Security with private retirement accounts -
although
doing so would require the Treasury to borrow at least $1 trillion. Mr.
Snow's reappointment neatly avoids the Senate confirmation hearings that
would
be required for a new appointment, as would the probable reappointment of
Joshua Bolten as the director of the Office of Management and Budget. A
major
opportunity to vet Mr. Snow's professional opinions and to probe for - dare
we suggest? - misgivings, is lost.

Internationally, the situation is even worse. Mr. Snow is squarely behind
the administration's apparent weak-dollar policy. If the dollar's decline
sharpens,
is Mr. Snow capable of cooperating with our trading partners to manage the
downward trajectory? It's kind of hard to be unilateral when you need China,
Japan and Europe to accomplish your goals.

The economy won't really improve unless Mr. Bush starts to listen to people
who will tell him things he does not want to hear, like the fact that the
only
lasting fix for the weak dollar is fiscal discipline to reduce the budget
deficit. Mr. Snow is not that person. Most ominously, the right person for
that
job doesn't exist - and couldn't get hired - in this administration.

Copyright 2004
The New York Times Company |