by Marie Cocco
To turn our eyes momentarily from the terrifying war in the Middle East is to discover an ever-more ominous turn in the Bush administration's war on terror.
Having been barred by the Supreme Court from treating foreign terrorism suspects as if they had few — or no — legal rights, the president's initial response is not to comply with the high court's finding that detainees must be treated under accepted standards of international law. In fact, the White House pushes to extend the ill treatment to American citizens.
That is, effectively, what the administration's draft of new rules for the military detention and trial of terrorism suspects would do. News and human rights organizations that have obtained the document, marked "deliberative draft — close hold," have criticized the way in which it would obliterate the Supreme Court's ruling. It seeks to have Congress write into law essentially the same procedures for military trials that the high court just said were illegal. That is, terrorism suspects still could be excluded from the courtroom, evidence could be withheld from the defense, and the Geneva Conventions — which the Supreme Court explicitly said must apply, would be circumvented.
More chilling is that the draft makes clear that the president wishes to impose these conditions upon any American citizen he calls an "enemy combatant."
A copy of the draft made public by The Washington Post shows that, while an initial version anticipated military trials only for "alien" enemy combatants, the word "alien" is subsequently crossed out. Instead, the document refers time and again to "persons" who are detainees. A "person," under this draft, could be an American seized at a shopping mall, or in a suburban backyard.
Here, then, is how the government could treat American citizens if this draft were to become law: A citizen could be designated an "enemy combatant" (a term the administration has never clearly defined) and held in a military prison. There, the citizen would have no right to a speedy trial. Any trials, the draft says, could occur "at any time without limitations."
Once the citizen is tried under rules that mock the constitutional protections he would receive in a federal court, or in a U.S. military court-martial, the outcome would mean little. An acquittal would not necessarily free the detainee. Neither would a sentence imposed, say, for two or three years and served in full. "An acquittal or conviction under this act does not preclude the United States, in accordance with the law of war, to detain enemy combatants until the cessation of hostilities as a means to prevent their return to the fight."
Of course, "the fight" as defined in the draft is not necessarily an armed battle. People may be designated "enemy combatants" and subject to these rules if the president and the Pentagon believe they are now or were once "part of, or supporting" the Taliban, al-Qaeda or "associated forces." Support isn't defined. It could mean shouting "long live Osama!" while walking down Pennsylvania Avenue.
All these powers are rightly the president's because he is commander in chief of the armed forces, according to the draft.
This is the precise argument the White House has tried, again and again, to get the Supreme Court to accept. It has failed.
In two cases in which President Bush indeed did detain American citizens indefinitely and without charge, the courts derailed the effort. After the Supreme Court ruled against the administration two years ago in the case of Yaser Hamdi, the military released him and returned him to his family in Saudi Arabia. In a second case involving Jose Padilla, a citizen who was picked up at Chicago's O'Hare Airport, the government finally issued an indictment four years into his detainment — just as the Supreme Court was considering Padilla's case.
The Bush administration now seeks from Congress an authorization for the blank check it once sought to give itself. If lawmakers hand him this, they will be handing over rights that Americans may never regain.
Contributors
Links
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(1766)
-
▼
August
(186)
- Quote of the Day
- " Fool me Once, Shame on You...
- Spin, Spin, Spin.....BTW, Where in the World is Ka...
- “What Happened in Ohio?: A Documentary Record of T...
- 10 weeks left to change the subject.
- Rumsfeld's Ghastly Speech to the American Legion
- Clinton Ended Welfare, Not Poverty
- What Keeps Don Rumsfeld Up at Night?
- The Photo that Haunts George Allen
- Iraqi Hospitals Are War's New "Killing Fields"
- Number of Americans without Health Insurance Conti...
- Welfare Reform is Not a Success
- Rumsfeld's Remarks
- I smell an election coming...
- Reclaiming The Issues: Islamic Or Republican Fasci...
- Illusion and Reality
- I'm So Broke" JokesI'm so broke, I go to KFC and l...
- While the President pats himself on the back . . .
- An Enron Twist: convicted but not guilty?
- Bush & Katrina: Return to the Scene of the Crime
- Carter slaps down "subservient" Blair
- Whitewash
- The Cheney Presidency
- The Man Who Said Too Much
- "I am Macaca"
- Warring Over the Heart of the Party
- Read it and Weep
- Bigotry: Out in the Open
- New analysis shows Democratic takeover of House li...
- Inquiry Opened Into Israeli Use of U.S. Bombs
- McCain Backtracks
- How Sorry is Andrew Young?
- Warantless Wiretap Program in Doubt
- Bringing "Dignity" Back to the White House
- Senator Allen Not Just A "Racist"
- http://iraqforsale.org/
- McCarthyism: From 1946 to 2006
- Pluto No Longer A Planet
- Twenty-first Century Rome
- Maynard Ferguson Is Dead
- To Iran With Love
- No title
- Like Father, Like Son
- Hirsh: Bush Takes Another August Vacation While “P...
- A refrain from Groucho Marx
- Refuse to be Terrorized
- Bush in his Helmet Stands Watch on the Rhine
- Fixing the Failed U.S. Reconstruction in Iraq
- Bush Cuts and Runs At Tora Bora, Helps Bin Laden E...
- Bush Fulfills Few Promises to Post-Katrina Gulf Co...
- Senator Jokes About House Painter
- Quote of the Day
- G.O.P. Corruption? Bring In the Conservatives. - N...
- Is God an Idiot?
- At Press Conference, Bush Stays the Course
- Tax Farmers, Mercenaries and Viceroys - New York T...
- The Chimp Speaks
- Pat Buchanan . . . poco loco?!
- Interview with Gore Vidal
- A Free Pass on War Crimes?
- Bush, Iraq and the "soul" of our nation
- Five Years After 9/11, Fear Finally Strikes Out - ...
- Whatever's Best For Holy Joe
- Why Do We Have A Democracy?
- Putting Humpty Dumpty together again
- Tiptoeing into the future.
- Why the Iraqis aren't as grateful as W would like...
- The Neo-Colonialist
- Bush Contemplates Rebirth of Dictatorship for Iraq
- Washpo Misses the Point on NSA Ruling
- Duelling Pageants
- "K" , like in Kings.
- Effective anti-terrorism enforcement or more poor ...
- Wages, Wealth and Politics - New York TimesThe New...
- It's Time to Censure a Lawless President
- Want Some Freedom Fries wit dat?
- Israel's debacle, courtesy of Bush
- No title
- In the NSA Case, a Judge Says No to King George
- What Happens When You Sell Your Soul To The Devil
- This Gang Can't Shoot Straight
- You Go, Girls.
- No Kings In America
- Fox News Airs Suggestion for "Muslim-Only" Airport...
- Another Turning Point in Iraq
- George Allen: Racist? Check. Swiftboating Draft Do...
- Pavlov's dogs of terror
- Terrorism
- Bush Out To Luncheon On Iraq
- You say "Macaca," I say "Mo' Caca"
- Neocon Dreams, American Nightmares
- Spinning Old Threats Into New Fears
- IF elections are still legal in November....
- Poll: Seven Dwarfs more famous than Supreme Court
- Interview with Seymour Hersh
- No title
- The Pols Who Cried Wolf
- A Distant Mirror - New York TimesThe New York Time...
- No title
- Unholy Alliance
-
▼
August
(186)
No comments:
Post a Comment