New York Times Editorial
Here is a way to measure how seriously President Bush was willing to compromise on the military tribunals bill: Less than an hour after an agreement was announced yesterday with three leading Republican senators, the White House was already laying a path to wiggle out of its one real concession.
About the only thing that Senators John Warner, John McCain and Lindsey Graham had to show for their defiance was Mr. Bush’s agreement to drop his insistence on allowing prosecutors of suspected terrorists to introduce classified evidence kept secret from the defendant. The White House agreed to abide by the rules of courts-martial, which bar secret evidence. (Although the administration’s supporters continually claim this means giving classified information to terrorists, the rules actually provide for reviewing, editing and summarizing classified material. Evidence that cannot be safely declassified cannot be introduced.)
This is a critical point. As Senator Graham keeps noting, the United States would never stand for any other country’s convicting an American citizen with undisclosed, secret evidence. So it seemed like a significant concession — until Stephen Hadley, the national security adviser, briefed reporters yesterday evening. He said that while the White House wants to honor this deal, the chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Duncan Hunter, still wants to permit secret evidence and should certainly have his say. To accept this spin requires believing that Mr. Hunter, who railroaded Mr. Bush’s original bill through his committee, is going to take any action not blessed by the White House.
On other issues, the three rebel senators achieved only modest improvements on the White House’s original positions. They wanted to bar evidence obtained through coercion. Now, they have agreed to allow it if a judge finds it reliable (which coerced evidence hardly can be) and relevant to guilt or innocence. The way coercion is measured in the bill, even those protections would not apply to the prisoners at Guantánamo Bay.
The deal does next to nothing to stop the president from reinterpreting the Geneva Conventions. While the White House agreed to a list of “grave breaches” of the conventions that could be prosecuted as war crimes, it stipulated that the president could decide on his own what actions might be a lesser breach of the Geneva Conventions and what interrogation techniques he considered permissible. It’s not clear how much the public will ultimately learn about those decisions. They will be contained in an executive order that is supposed to be made public, but Mr. Hadley reiterated that specific interrogation techniques will remain secret.
Even before the compromises began to emerge, the overall bill prepared by the three senators had fatal flaws. It allows the president to declare any foreigner, anywhere, an “illegal enemy combatant” using a dangerously broad definition, and detain him without any trial. It not only fails to deal with the fact that many of the Guantánamo detainees are not terrorists and will never be charged, but it also chokes off any judicial review.
The Democrats have largely stood silent and allowed the trio of Republicans to do the lifting. It’s time for them to either try to fix this bill or delay it until after the election. The American people expect their leaders to clean up this mess without endangering U.S. troops, eviscerating American standards of justice, or further harming the nation’s severely damaged reputation.
Contributors
Links
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(1766)
-
▼
September
(220)
- How George Bush Admitted His War Crimes by Richar...
- 9/11 Commission Counsel: Bush Admin. May Have Cove...
- How Mark Foley Represents The Entire Republican Party
- Bush Backrub
- Foley pushed child porn bills, asked: "Do I make y...
- Our Allies in TWOT.
- Iraqi democracy, as taught by America
- Two critiques of string theory.by Jim Holt
- Ruth Conniff:The “In Crowd” Versus the “Populists”
- Book Says Bush Ignored Urgent Warning on Iraq By D...
- Why Bill Clinton Pushed Back
- I think I have seen everything. posted by unhappyc...
- Waterboarding DefinedDavid Corn writes that as the...
- Uh...Jack who?
- The "We Have to Win" Mythby Cenk UygurBob Woodward...
- All The President's Lies
- Photo Finish
- Condi Rice: Liar, Stupid, or Both?
- Oy Vey!!!
- GOP Can’t Handle the 9/11 TruthBy Joe ConasonThe m...
- Clinton vs. Bush: A foolish fight for the GOP to p...
- No title
- At war, in denial
- New News Is Bad News by Molly Ivins Noshing on ...
- Republicans Are Losers, So Make Sure They Lose
- A Case for Impeachmentby Elizabeth HoltzmanThe fra...
- Dems Propose Emergency Voting Legislation To Provi...
- Rice Falsely Claims Bush’s Pre-9/11 Anti-Terror Ef...
- Clinton vs. Fox's Chris Wallace: Condi Rice offers...
- Olbermann’s Special Comment: Are YOURS the actions...
- Republicans Give In To Bush, Betray Americaby Thom...
- Fascism at the Gate
- Due Process, Bulldozed - New York TimesThe New Yor...
- To the terrorists' level
- To the terrorists' level
- Demonizing ChávezLove him, hate him, fear him, rev...
- Challenging the Culture of Obedience by Ross C. An...
- If you want to know why the Media is fucked upby A...
- No title
- CIA Deal Reveals Shirker and Cipher by Les Payne ...
- Who wanted to "cut and run" from Somalia?by Glenn ...
- Teammate: "George Allen is a racist."WASHINGTON --...
- The Devil and George Bush
- Bill Clinton's Bipartisan Love-In Blows Up In His ...
- OFFICIALS WARY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES
- "Just a comma"
- The Fox Conventions
- life cycle
- BUSH READING PROGRAM GETS FAILING GRADE
- Bush Seeks Immunity for Violating War Crimes Act
- The October Surprise
- Slippery Slope
- Axis of Sketchy Allies - New York TimesThe New Yor...
- Spy Agencies Say Iraq War Worsens Terrorism Threat...
- Hugo Chávez InterviewBy Greg Palast, "Here the em...
- Orwell: Politics and the English LanguagePolitics ...
- The Bush administration vs. the founding American ...
- Clinton Takes On Fox NewsToday, President Bill Cli...
- French paper says bin Laden died in Pakistan Saudi...
- Insurance Horror Stories - New York TimesThe New Y...
- Is the GOP manipulating gas prices?
- GOP: Just Say No to Peace and Prosperityby mcjoan ...
- CHAVEZ TO DISCOUNT OIL FOR U.S. POOR
- When we pay our taxes, we will be paying for torture
- Marty Lederman: Senators Snatch Defeat From Jaws o...
- White House denies it threatened to bomb ally Paki...
- A Bad Bargain
- When Will the Pope Apologize for the Long History ...
- The abduction and torture of an innocent man
- Bill O'Reilly The Baron Munchausen Of Cable News?R...
- Torture in Iraq Worse Now Than Under Saddam
- Saudi Arabia/OPEC Establish A "Reasonable'" Price ...
- Where Torture Got Him
- When War is on the Horizon, Follow the Money
- From NBC's Mike ViqueiraThe House Judiciary Commit...
- Meltdown: Ice Cracks at North Pole
- Robert Rivkin: Bush's Paltry Excuse for Subverting...
- The Fix Isn't InDon't count on the architects of f...
- The long way homeCall us cynical, but we've long ...
- Bush's brain found lacking
- King of Pain - New York TimesThe New York TimesPri...
- Senator Dorgan to the Cheney/Halliburton Pentagon:...
- Quote of the DayNational Security Advisor Stephen ...
- Spiritual Niggers: Islam and the West
- The Swift Boat Connection to ABC's 9/11 Deception
- The Longer the War, The Larger the Lie
- LIEBERMAN PLEADS FOR UNITY AGAINST "BARBARIANS"
- Bush's Useful IdiotsSince 9/11, US liberals have s...
- WP: Missteps in Iraq rebuilding
- Earth to Wolf Blitzer
- New Air America Line-up Announced Amidst Reports o...
- Torture Impasse: The Content of Our CharacterJerem...
- Getting with "The Program": Clarity Through Obfusc...
- Molly Ivins : Remembering Ann Richards
- "We tortured an insane man."
- Progress or Regress? - New York TimesThe New York ...
- The Costs of Crying Wolf by Kirsten A. PowersIf Am...
- More Legal Trouble For Rove: Attorney Says He Targ...
- HITS OF THE 60'SIt was fun being a baby boomer .....
- Ohio congressman pleads guilty
-
▼
September
(220)
No comments:
Post a Comment