Contributors
Links
Friday, September 29, 2006
Why Bill Clinton Pushed Back
By E. J. Dionne Jr.
Bill Clinton's eruption on "Fox News Sunday" last weekend over questions about his administration's handling of terrorism was a long time coming and has political implications that go beyond this fall's elections.
By choosing to intervene in the terror debate in a way that no one could miss, Clinton forced an argument about the past that had up to now been largely a one-sided propaganda war waged by the right. The conservative movement understands the political value of controlling the interpretation of history. Now its control is finally being contested.
How long have Clinton's resentments been simmering? We remember the period immediately after Sept. 11 as a time when partisanship melted away. That is largely true, especially because Democrats rallied behind President Bush. For months after the attacks, Democrats did not raise questions about why they had happened on Bush's watch.
But not everyone was nonpartisan. On Oct. 4, 2001, a mere three weeks and a couple of days after the twin towers fell and the Pentagon was hit, there was Rush Limbaugh arguing on the Wall Street Journal's op-ed page: "If we're serious about avoiding past mistakes and improving national security, we can't duck some serious questions about Mr. Clinton's presidency."
To this day I remain astonished at Limbaugh's gall -- and at his shrewdness. Republicans were arguing simultaneously that it was treasonous finger-pointing to question what Bush did or failed to do to prevent the attacks, but patriotic to go after Clinton. Thus did they build up a mythology that cast Bush as the tough hero in confronting the terrorist threat and Clinton as the shirker. Bad history. Smart politics.
Moreover, when Democrats, notably former House minority leader Richard Gephardt, finally put their heads up in the late spring of 2002 to ask questions about that Aug. 6, 2001, memo warning of the possibility of terrorist attacks, the Republican pushback was furious.
Vice President Cheney, addressing his Democratic "friends" in Congress, said on May 16, 2002, that "they need to be very cautious not to seek political advantage by making incendiary suggestions, as were made by some today, that the White House had advance information that would have prevented the tragic attacks of 9/11. Such commentary is thoroughly irresponsible and totally unworthy of national leaders in a time of war."
Boy, that was defensive, wasn't it? Funny that Cheney didn't respond that way when Limbaugh made his incendiary attack on Clinton. Opportunistic and inconsistent? Sure, but again, smart politics.
This is just a fragment of a long history of evasion and blame-shifting by the administration and its supporters. And the polemical distortions of history came roaring back earlier this month in ABC's fictionalized account of the Sept. 11 events that butchered the Clinton record.
This history-as-attack-ad approach won praise from none other than Limbaugh, who described the film's screenwriter as a friend. Limbaugh was pleased that the film was "just devastating to the Clinton administration" and attacked its critics as "just a bunch of thin-skinned bullies." Pot-and-kettle metaphors don't begin to do justice to the hilarity of Limbaugh's saying such a thing.
And so Clinton exploded. My canvassing of Clinton insiders suggests two things about his outburst on "Fox News Sunday." First, he did not go into the studio knowing he would do it. There was, they say, a spontaneity to his anger. But, second, he had thought long and hard about comparisons between his record on terrorism and Bush's. He had his lines down pat from private musing about how he had been turned into a punching bag by the right. Something like this, one adviser said, was bound to happen eventually.
Sober, moderate opinion will say what sober, moderate opinion always says about an episode of this sort: Tut tut, Clinton looked unpresidential, we should worry about the future, not the past, blah, blah, blah.
But sober, moderate opinion was largely silent as the right wing slashed and distorted Clinton's record on terrorism. It largely stood by as the Bush administration tried to intimidate its own critics into silence. As a result, the day-to-day political conversation was tilted toward a distorted view of the past. All the sins of omission and commission were piled onto Clinton while Bush was cast as the nation's angelic avenger. And as conservatives understand, our view of the past greatly influences what we do in the present.
A genuinely sober and moderate view would recognize that it's time the scales of history were righted. Propagandistic accounts need to be challenged, systematically and consistently. The debate needed a very hard shove. Clinton delivered it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(1766)
-
▼
September
(220)
- How George Bush Admitted His War Crimes by Richar...
- 9/11 Commission Counsel: Bush Admin. May Have Cove...
- How Mark Foley Represents The Entire Republican Party
- Bush Backrub
- Foley pushed child porn bills, asked: "Do I make y...
- Our Allies in TWOT.
- Iraqi democracy, as taught by America
- Two critiques of string theory.by Jim Holt
- Ruth Conniff:The “In Crowd” Versus the “Populists”
- Book Says Bush Ignored Urgent Warning on Iraq By D...
- Why Bill Clinton Pushed Back
- I think I have seen everything. posted by unhappyc...
- Waterboarding DefinedDavid Corn writes that as the...
- Uh...Jack who?
- The "We Have to Win" Mythby Cenk UygurBob Woodward...
- All The President's Lies
- Photo Finish
- Condi Rice: Liar, Stupid, or Both?
- Oy Vey!!!
- GOP Can’t Handle the 9/11 TruthBy Joe ConasonThe m...
- Clinton vs. Bush: A foolish fight for the GOP to p...
- No title
- At war, in denial
- New News Is Bad News by Molly Ivins Noshing on ...
- Republicans Are Losers, So Make Sure They Lose
- A Case for Impeachmentby Elizabeth HoltzmanThe fra...
- Dems Propose Emergency Voting Legislation To Provi...
- Rice Falsely Claims Bush’s Pre-9/11 Anti-Terror Ef...
- Clinton vs. Fox's Chris Wallace: Condi Rice offers...
- Olbermann’s Special Comment: Are YOURS the actions...
- Republicans Give In To Bush, Betray Americaby Thom...
- Fascism at the Gate
- Due Process, Bulldozed - New York TimesThe New Yor...
- To the terrorists' level
- To the terrorists' level
- Demonizing ChávezLove him, hate him, fear him, rev...
- Challenging the Culture of Obedience by Ross C. An...
- If you want to know why the Media is fucked upby A...
- No title
- CIA Deal Reveals Shirker and Cipher by Les Payne ...
- Who wanted to "cut and run" from Somalia?by Glenn ...
- Teammate: "George Allen is a racist."WASHINGTON --...
- The Devil and George Bush
- Bill Clinton's Bipartisan Love-In Blows Up In His ...
- OFFICIALS WARY OF ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES
- "Just a comma"
- The Fox Conventions
- life cycle
- BUSH READING PROGRAM GETS FAILING GRADE
- Bush Seeks Immunity for Violating War Crimes Act
- The October Surprise
- Slippery Slope
- Axis of Sketchy Allies - New York TimesThe New Yor...
- Spy Agencies Say Iraq War Worsens Terrorism Threat...
- Hugo Chávez InterviewBy Greg Palast, "Here the em...
- Orwell: Politics and the English LanguagePolitics ...
- The Bush administration vs. the founding American ...
- Clinton Takes On Fox NewsToday, President Bill Cli...
- French paper says bin Laden died in Pakistan Saudi...
- Insurance Horror Stories - New York TimesThe New Y...
- Is the GOP manipulating gas prices?
- GOP: Just Say No to Peace and Prosperityby mcjoan ...
- CHAVEZ TO DISCOUNT OIL FOR U.S. POOR
- When we pay our taxes, we will be paying for torture
- Marty Lederman: Senators Snatch Defeat From Jaws o...
- White House denies it threatened to bomb ally Paki...
- A Bad Bargain
- When Will the Pope Apologize for the Long History ...
- The abduction and torture of an innocent man
- Bill O'Reilly The Baron Munchausen Of Cable News?R...
- Torture in Iraq Worse Now Than Under Saddam
- Saudi Arabia/OPEC Establish A "Reasonable'" Price ...
- Where Torture Got Him
- When War is on the Horizon, Follow the Money
- From NBC's Mike ViqueiraThe House Judiciary Commit...
- Meltdown: Ice Cracks at North Pole
- Robert Rivkin: Bush's Paltry Excuse for Subverting...
- The Fix Isn't InDon't count on the architects of f...
- The long way homeCall us cynical, but we've long ...
- Bush's brain found lacking
- King of Pain - New York TimesThe New York TimesPri...
- Senator Dorgan to the Cheney/Halliburton Pentagon:...
- Quote of the DayNational Security Advisor Stephen ...
- Spiritual Niggers: Islam and the West
- The Swift Boat Connection to ABC's 9/11 Deception
- The Longer the War, The Larger the Lie
- LIEBERMAN PLEADS FOR UNITY AGAINST "BARBARIANS"
- Bush's Useful IdiotsSince 9/11, US liberals have s...
- WP: Missteps in Iraq rebuilding
- Earth to Wolf Blitzer
- New Air America Line-up Announced Amidst Reports o...
- Torture Impasse: The Content of Our CharacterJerem...
- Getting with "The Program": Clarity Through Obfusc...
- Molly Ivins : Remembering Ann Richards
- "We tortured an insane man."
- Progress or Regress? - New York TimesThe New York ...
- The Costs of Crying Wolf by Kirsten A. PowersIf Am...
- More Legal Trouble For Rove: Attorney Says He Targ...
- HITS OF THE 60'SIt was fun being a baby boomer .....
- Ohio congressman pleads guilty
-
▼
September
(220)
No comments:
Post a Comment