No reason to make nice
Nancy Pelosi must be tough in pressing the Democrats' agenda -- and she needn't heed hypocritical Republicans who won't cooperate.
By Joe Conason
Nancy Pelosi deserves congratulations as the first woman elected to serve as speaker of the House of Representatives -- and for her decision to place the promises made by her party to the American people above the principle of minority rights within Congress. After the Democrats have fulfilled their vow to take action during the new session's "first 100 hours," there will still be plenty of time to show that they can wield the majority gavel with more decency and decorum than their most recent predecessors.
Frankly, that won't be difficult, but it can wait.
In her first remarks as speaker Thursday, Pelosi made all the proper noises about healing, unity, partnership, working together, respecting everybody's opinions and being the leader of the entire House. But as the Republicans have repeatedly proved over the past decade or so, bipartisanship is overrated. Now that they're in the minority, the Republicans may claim that there is nothing more wonderful than the two parties working together, debating everything openly, and treating each other as they would wish to be treated themselves. But they never allowed those old-fashioned values to get in the way of anything that actually matters to them, such as cutting taxes on their wealthy contributors or winning elections.
That ruthless attitude has dominated Washington during the presidency of George W. Bush, as the GOP gained control of all three branches of government. So when Bush urges cooperation between the parties, as he did in the pages of the Wall Street Journal, it is important to remember how casually he and his party trashed the Democrats in the months following 9/11, when bipartisan national unity was so desperately needed -- and after the Democratic leaders in Congress had pledged their complete cooperation to him. The Republican National Committee, the Republican congressional campaign committees and the White House political operation responded, characteristically, by questioning the Democrats' patriotism during the 2002 election.
Naturally, the vanquished bullies are afraid that they will soon suffer the same indignities they inflicted on the Democratic minority with such relish and zeal. They fear that the Democrats will shut them up on the House floor, ignore them in scheduling and administering the business of the House, and manipulate the rules to render them politically impotent. They worry, in short, that they will get what has been coming to them for a long time.
Nothing is funnier than watching Republicans fretting and whining about their deserved fate, as Dana Milbank observed in the Washington Post. They have the gall to complain that Pelosi, who implored them to observe civility and regular order when she became the minority leader, may now ignore similar pleas coming from their side. They say they will be "disappointed" if she fails to live up to her ideals of perfect openness and fairness. She has no reason to heed these hypocrites -- until they show that their own attitudes have changed.
As Pelosi pushes through the progressive legislation of the first 100 hours, the basic facts are on her side. Under her leadership, the Democrats won a larger majority last November than the Republicans have enjoyed at any time since they took over in 1994. And in the 2006 election, the Democrats did not lose a single House seat, which is the first time that has been achieved by either political party for almost 70 years.
Just as important, the Democrats ran a campaign that emphasized issues the "do-nothing" Republicans failed to address -- and won because the public supports the Democratic position on those issues, from increasing the minimum wage to reducing the cost of prescription drugs and student loans to investing in alternative energy, all of which have been debated for years. (In the case of the minimum wage, the issue has been debated annually for almost 10 years without relief.)
The Republican Party is at a nadir of popularity, with its congressional leadership rejected and its president discredited. The new Democratic speaker can act in full confidence that the public is behind her. She should move her party's agenda briskly, while carefully gauging whether the opposition prefers cooperation or confrontation.
If the Republicans play a constructive role as the new Congress opens, then Pelosi ought to reward them by treating them as the partners they claim to be. In principle, she should live up to the ideals of fairness that she articulated as the leader of the minority. But if the Republicans choose to obstruct, then she must be tough -- just as tough as the Republicans were when they sought to pass the "Contract With America" in 1995.
Two years from today, and for many years to come, what the nation's voters will remember is whether the first woman speaker lived up to her promise to move swiftly and decisively on the issues that returned her party to power. Being nice to the Republicans will be no excuse for failing to do so.
Contributors
Links
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(1094)
-
▼
January
(125)
- And What if Al-Qaeda Lights the Fuse?
- Impeachment by the Peopleby Howard ZinnCourage is ...
- Fair Tradeby Thomas GeogheganWhat the left should ...
- American RouletteIn our winner-take-all casino eco...
- Even Scalia Agrees
- The First Amendment: Good When You Can Get It
- Mad About Mary - New York TimesThe New York Times-...
- Reporter defeats gov. intimidationBy Evan Derkac...
- Yes, I’m Listening to Kerry By Marie CoccoWASHINGT...
- The Black Gold Rush: Divvying Up Iraq's OilA refor...
- No title
- The danger of Bush's anti-Iran fatwaThe president'...
- Breaking Another Iraq Tabooby Sen. Russ FeingoldFo...
- Fleischer: Libby told me about Plame "on the q.t."...
- Fw: Thanks for joining the Virtual March!
- Tikkun Blog, Saturday, January 27 2007 @ 07:05 PM ...
- 'We Are the Deciders'John Nichols reports on a new...
- Lieberman: I Might Vote Republican In '08
- Dictator in Chief
- Portrait of the Monster as a Young ArtistBy J. M. ...
- Stars, tens of thousands in Washington D.C. protes...
- A Post Mortem on the Voting Processby Tova Andrea ...
- Cheney's Key Role in Leak Case Detailed
- Chuck Norris Fact: Fabricated Path to 9/11 Scene ‘...
- Fraud, Reform, And Political Power: Controlling Th...
- On Being Partisan - New York TimesThe New York Tim...
- Libby Witness: I Told Scooter About Valerie Plame ...
- Bush’s Specious Arguments on Iraq in his State of ...
- Kennedy to Republicans: "What is it about working ...
- Ghosts of dirty tricks pastThe right-wing smear ca...
- Bomb Bomb Bomb, Bomb Bomb Iran
- Huddle Up! By David Swanson t r u t h o u t ...
- Perle, Ricks face offRichard Perle seemed to pull ...
- Carl Bernstein: Bush Administraton Has Done 'Far G...
- A Breath of Fresh Air - NOT!
- Return of the Drug Company Payoffs - New York Time...
- At Brandeis, Carter Responds to Critics - New York...
- The Social Security WMD Story By Dean Baker, tru...
- Sen. Jim Webb's Response in its EntiretySENATOR JI...
- Two long years to goDespite his prattle about cutt...
- Why We Fight
- State of indifferenceUnlike past presidents dealin...
- Could this be the final chapter in the life of the...
- The Mainstream Media's Take on Iraq: Right, Left.....
- 2 Car Bombs Kill Scores at Packed Market in Baghda...
- Prince of Darkness Returns
- Our Pals, those Whacky Pakis
- How Rice Uses HistoryU.S. Secretary of State Condo...
- Disaster by Designby Robert FarleyWhy the Iraq occ...
- Harpy, Hero, Heretic: HillaryWith Hillary Clinton'...
- Blinded by the Right
- Two Taxed AmericasBy E.J. DionneWASHINGTON—Ask you...
- Our Iraqi Friends Befriend Our EnemiesBy Joe Conas...
- One Of The Deadliest Days For US Forces In Iraq: A...
- America Strikes Back by Cenk UygurDick Cheney has ...
- Dems Seek to Bar U.S. Attacks on IranBy LAURIE KEL...
- No title
- Enough with the new bipartisanship Barack Obama ma...
- PANEL GRILLS GONZALES OVER SPY PROGRAMFreeMarketNe...
- Surging and Purging - New York TimesThe New York T...
- Apology Not Accepted - New York TimesThe New York ...
- Student Sues UCLAhttp://www.sanluisobispo.com/mld/...
- Washington 'snubbed Iran offer'Iran offered the US...
- The fighting side of McCainHitching his political ...
- The battle for an Iraq planThe Bush surge has lawm...
- Gonzales: We'll get court orders for spy program n...
- An Impartial Interrogation of George W. BushSen. ...
- Happy Birthday Champ
- And Bin Laden spent a few thousand dollars on airl...
- Rebuilding Teams Would Swell Under Bush's New Iraq...
- The collapse of the Bush presidency poses risksby ...
- • Many in the hot seat at Libby trial
- Stumbling Around the World - New York TimesThe New...
- Bush Breaks 150-Year History of Higher US Taxes in...
- Escalating Folly: Will Congressional Republicans S...
- Just ask Alice
- A Glimpse at America's Brewing Nightmare with Iran...
- Official Attacks Top Law Firms Over Detainees - Ne...
- A Fascist we will go,a facist we will go,
- Bush's Iraq Speech Annotatedby Stephen Zunes
- Joe Lieberman . . . A Profile In Courage
- Fox News has its Finger on the Pulse of America: B...
- Bush's Bitch, Joe Lieberman
- Did the U.S. just provoke Iran?By Juan Cole
- And you thought Alan Hevesi was corrupt?
- Our Pals the Paks
- Iran's response to Irbil Consulate attack?
- Bush Opens New Front in Iraqi War
- January 11, 2007 Yesterday afternoon, the House of...
- Senators tell Rice: The president has lost usby Ti...
- A Surge in American Forces is Unacceptableby Rep. ...
- On to Iran?A deflated commander in chief tries to ...
- The President's New Way Forward Plan: Shocking in ...
- No title
- Escalation? It's Not His Decision to Makeby Sen. E...
- Going Up Before Going Down
- The White House Threatens to Ignore Congressby Cen...
- Strange Odor Permeates New York City
- The Timely Death of Gerald Ford - New York TimesTh...
- The Imperial Presidency 2.0 - New York TimesThe Ne...
-
▼
January
(125)
No comments:
Post a Comment