By NEDRA PICKLER, Associated Press Writer
In a move designed to win support for immigration reform from get-tough conservatives, President Bush plans to send thousands of National Guard troops to help secure the Mexican border.
Bush, in a speech to the nation Monday, will propose using the troops as a stopgap measure while the Border Patrol builds up its resources to more effectively secure the 2,000-mile line between the U.S. and Mexico, said two White House officials speaking on a condition of anonymity before the president is scheduled to speak at 8 p.m. EDT.
In a signal of the high stakes on the issue, Bush was to make his case in a rare prime-time address from the Oval Office. He planned to follow up the address with a visit Thursday to the border in Arizona.
Bush was to call for the troops to play a supportive role to Border Patrol agents, who would maintain primary responsibility for physically guarding the border. Bush also will mention the need for immigrants to learn English and assimilate into American culture if they are to become citizens.
But lawmakers have expressed concern about overextending a National Guard force that is already tied up in Iraq. And Mexican President Vicente Fox called Bush Sunday to express concern about what he called the possibility of a "militarized" border between the two nations.
White House spokeswoman Maria Tamburri said Bush made clear to Fox that "the United States considered Mexico a friend and that what is being considered is not militarization of the border, but support of border capabilities on a temporary basis by the National Guard."
Bush also assured Fox that any military support would be administrative and logistical and would come from the National Guard and not the Army, according to a news release from Fox's office.
Bush hopes adding the National Guard troops to make the border more secure will persuade congressional conservatives to approve a broader immigration bill that would include his primary objective — creating temporary work permits for foreigners to enter the country and take low-paying jobs. That idea is favored by the business community, but many conservatives want a tougher approach on illegal immigrants trying to sneak into the country.
The officials who discussed Bush's proposal would not say how many troops he wanted to use, except that it would be in the thousands but less than 10,000 — an estimate being discussed at the Pentagon.
About 100 National Guard troops are serving on the border to assist with counter-drug operations, heavy equipment support and other functions. Some lawmakers say an increase is unwise.
"We've got National Guard members on their second, third and fourth tours in Iraq," said Sen. Chuck Hagel (news, bio, voting record), R-Neb. "We have stretched our military as thin as we have ever seen it in modern times. And what in the world are we talking about here, sending a National Guard that we may not have any capacity to send up to or down to protect borders? That's not their role."
Hagel said the bill under debate in the Senate that he helped write would double the 12,000-strong Border Patrol force over the next five years. "That's the way to fix it, not further stretching the National Guard," he said on ABC's "This Week."
Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., said there may be a need for troops to fill in while the Border Patrol is bolstered. But he did not seem confident that the National Guard could take on the extra duty.
"We have stretched these men and women so thin, so thin, because of the bad mistakes done by the civilians in the military here, that I wonder how they're going to be able to do it," Biden said, also on ABC.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., defended Bush's plan. He said lawmakers who doubt that the National Guard could take on border patrol duty are "whining" and "moaning."
"We've got to secure our borders," Frist said on CNN. "We hear it from the American people. We've got millions of people coming across that border. First and foremost, secure the border, whatever it takes. Everything else we've done has failed. We've got to face that. And so we need to bring in, I believe, the National Guard."
Contributors
Links
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(1766)
-
▼
May
(164)
- Gore: Bush is "renegade rightwing extremist"
- Court curbs government whistleblowers
- The Bush Stops Here
- Love Letter from Jeb
- Fw: Weapons of Mass Destruction: House Acts to Sto...
- A quid is search of a quo
- Exporting Chaos
- Did Bush's "Bring it On" Bravado Bring On the Hadi...
- Blair Bowed to U.S. Pressure in Speech
- Murtha: Scandal may undermine Iraq effort
- Who gets blamed for Enron?
- At 12, a Mother of Two - New York TimesThe New Yor...
- Pelosi Speaks
- Requiem for a Nightmare
- Hillary Cllinton's Character Gap
- The Hardest Word
- "Media Matters"
- Bush at West Point
- Chicken and egg debate unscrambled
- Devasting in Its Implications
- With a Few Humble Words, Bush Silences His Texas S...
- Fw: Breaking News.....
- Enron's Schemes "The Very Nature of Profit-Based, ...
- A Test of Our Character - New York TimesThe New Yo...
- Democrats Agree to Confirm Beelzebub
- Fw: SavetheInternet Update: Small Vote, Big Victo...
- Rise and Fall of the Enron Boys
- The "War on Terror" Fog
- Slipping into irrelevance, the president pauses to...
- Fw: Next STEPs - Talk to Congress at Home on Memor...
- Republican Senators Debate Gay Marriage
- "Victory"? Forget it
- What Co-Equal Branches? I'm the Decider!!
- An Interview with John Dean
- Corps On Gore
- Fw: House Vote on ANWR Expected This Week - FCNL
- Surprisingly, There's Reason For Optimism
- Fw: Small Arms: A New Global Code of Conduct for A...
- Katherine Harris--Still a Crook
- Bush's Faith Worries Albright
- Bush Snubs Gore Film on Global Warming
- The Right Discovers Bush's Dishonesty
- Killer Girl Scouts - New York TimesThe New York Ti...
- The Rove Da Vinci Code - New York TimesThe New Yor...
- Republican Elitist Watch
- Neglected Afghanistan Flares Up
- Bush's Base Betrayal
- Why I Spoke Up
- Game Time
- Phone Spies
- Daou Report
- Graduate at New School Heckle Speech by McCain
- Loose Change
- No Rush to Impeachment
- A Right Turn Holds Perils For Bush
- Where have all the red states gone?
- Let's get out now.
- When Glaciers Attack--The World That Might Have Been
- An American Idea Shatters
- Hawks for Withdrawal
- Whores and Liars....
- Sweet Land of Secrecy....
- Fw: Stop the Nuclear Deal with India - FCNL
- Get the Nurse, Pat's hearing voices again
- Judy, Judy, Judy
- Secrets or lies, and maybe both
- The Usual Suspects
- Irresponsible and Obscene
- Fox News Presents! The War On Darkies
- Guffaws for Bush's Immigration Speech
- The New York Times Cover-Up Continues
- Joe Klein Plays The Conyers Card
- Rising Diabetes Threat Meets a Falling Budget - Ne...
- Fw: Nuclear Iran: Didn't the U.S. Already Try This...
- Losing The War On Terror?
- More Bogeymen
- America the Titanic
- Heckuva Job, Dubya
- Karl and George's not-so-excellent adventure
- They Knew It Was Illegal
- Dangerous Liaison
- FBI Acknowledges: Journalists Phone Records are Fa...
- An indictmen watch, but what about Cheney?
- America the Fearful - New York TimesThe New York T...
- Bill Maher's Message to the President
- D for Debacle - New York TimesThe New York TimesMa...
- Fw: Urgent Alert on Climate Change: Ask Your Repr...
- ABC report: Government is tracking reporters' calls
- Americans support NSA program? Not so fast.
- NSA Sweep "Waste of Time" Analyst Says
- Bush to Propose Guard Troops for Border
- Maverick--or panderer?
- Just like Carmela Soprano...
- Will the Real Traitors Please Stand Up? - New York...
- Allah Akbar?
- Rove Indicted!
- White House, NSA Block Investigation of Spying
- A Coming Tsunami--The Republican's Bankruptcy of I...
- Joe Lieberman: The Collapse of a Paper Tiger
- Mentally Ill Troops Kept In Combat
-
▼
May
(164)
No comments:
Post a Comment