by Oliver Burkeman and Jonathan Freedland
Wednesday May 31, 2006
Guardian
Al Gore has made his sharpest attack yet on the George Bush presidency, describing the current US administration as "a renegade band of rightwing extremists".
In an interview with the Guardian today, the former vice-president calls himself a "recovering politician", but launches into the political fray more explicitly than he has previously done during his high-profile campaigning on the threat of global warming.
Denying that his politics have shifted to the left since he lost the court battle for the 2000 election, Mr Gore says: "If you have a renegade band of rightwing extremists who get hold of power, the whole thing goes to the right."
But he claims he does not "expect to be a candidate" for president again, while refusing explicitly to rule out another run. Asked if any event could change his mind, he says: "Not that I can see."
Mr Gore, who appeared at the Guardian Hay literary festival over the bank holiday weekend, is promoting An Inconvenient Truth, a documentary and book detailing the climate change crisis that he warns "could literally end civilisation".
The new levels of attention he is receiving have led some Democrats to call on him to run again for president, while others have responded with anger that Mr Gore did not show the same level of passion in the 2000 campaign.
He has since acknowledged that he followed too closely the advice of his consultants during that campaign, and - before he started to scoff at the idea of running again - swore that if he ever did so, he would speak his mind.
In the years since, he has been a steady critic of specific Bush administration policies. He opposed the war on Iraq at a time when most prominent Democrats were supporting it, and more recently spoke out against what he called "a gross and excessive power grab" by the administration over phone tapping.
In the interview Mr Gore also distances himself from Tony Blair on the subject of nuclear power, which the prime minister has insisted is "back on the agenda with a vengeance". Mr Gore says he is "sceptical about it playing a much larger role," and that although it might have a part to play in Britain or China, it will not be "a silver bullet" in the fight against global warming.
In the US, Mr Gore's environmental campaign has sparked a backlash from some on the right who accuse him of scaremongering. A series of television advertisements, launched by a thinktank called the Competitive Enterprise Institute, argue that carbon dioxide emissions are a sign of American productivity and progress.
Mr Gore's true attitude towards a potential return to the White House - or, at least, a potential battle with Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination - remains unknown.
At the weekend, Time magazine reported that he was telling key fundraisers they should feel free to sign on with other potential candidates. The magazine quoted unnamed Democratic sources as saying that the former vice-president had also been asking the fundraisers to "tell everybody I'm not running".
Mr Gore would not find it difficult to raise millions of dollars, if he did decide to run. But while public denials might prove a wise campaign strategy - not least by prolonging the period of positive attention Mr Gore is now receiving - actively turning away fundraisers does suggest a firmer resolve not to re-enter electoral politics.
It is significant, however, that Mr Gore refuses to go beyond saying that he has no "plans" for such a campaign. "I haven't made a Shermanesque statement because it just seems odd to do so," he has said - a reference to the famous announcement by the civil war general William Sherman, who unequivocally refused to stand in the election of 1884. "If nominated, I will not run; if elected, I will not serve," General Sherman said.
Jonathan Freedland's interview with Al Gore will be aired on More4 on Saturday June 3 at 4.55pm.
Contributors
Links
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(1766)
-
▼
May
(164)
- Gore: Bush is "renegade rightwing extremist"
- Court curbs government whistleblowers
- The Bush Stops Here
- Love Letter from Jeb
- Fw: Weapons of Mass Destruction: House Acts to Sto...
- A quid is search of a quo
- Exporting Chaos
- Did Bush's "Bring it On" Bravado Bring On the Hadi...
- Blair Bowed to U.S. Pressure in Speech
- Murtha: Scandal may undermine Iraq effort
- Who gets blamed for Enron?
- At 12, a Mother of Two - New York TimesThe New Yor...
- Pelosi Speaks
- Requiem for a Nightmare
- Hillary Cllinton's Character Gap
- The Hardest Word
- "Media Matters"
- Bush at West Point
- Chicken and egg debate unscrambled
- Devasting in Its Implications
- With a Few Humble Words, Bush Silences His Texas S...
- Fw: Breaking News.....
- Enron's Schemes "The Very Nature of Profit-Based, ...
- A Test of Our Character - New York TimesThe New Yo...
- Democrats Agree to Confirm Beelzebub
- Fw: SavetheInternet Update: Small Vote, Big Victo...
- Rise and Fall of the Enron Boys
- The "War on Terror" Fog
- Slipping into irrelevance, the president pauses to...
- Fw: Next STEPs - Talk to Congress at Home on Memor...
- Republican Senators Debate Gay Marriage
- "Victory"? Forget it
- What Co-Equal Branches? I'm the Decider!!
- An Interview with John Dean
- Corps On Gore
- Fw: House Vote on ANWR Expected This Week - FCNL
- Surprisingly, There's Reason For Optimism
- Fw: Small Arms: A New Global Code of Conduct for A...
- Katherine Harris--Still a Crook
- Bush's Faith Worries Albright
- Bush Snubs Gore Film on Global Warming
- The Right Discovers Bush's Dishonesty
- Killer Girl Scouts - New York TimesThe New York Ti...
- The Rove Da Vinci Code - New York TimesThe New Yor...
- Republican Elitist Watch
- Neglected Afghanistan Flares Up
- Bush's Base Betrayal
- Why I Spoke Up
- Game Time
- Phone Spies
- Daou Report
- Graduate at New School Heckle Speech by McCain
- Loose Change
- No Rush to Impeachment
- A Right Turn Holds Perils For Bush
- Where have all the red states gone?
- Let's get out now.
- When Glaciers Attack--The World That Might Have Been
- An American Idea Shatters
- Hawks for Withdrawal
- Whores and Liars....
- Sweet Land of Secrecy....
- Fw: Stop the Nuclear Deal with India - FCNL
- Get the Nurse, Pat's hearing voices again
- Judy, Judy, Judy
- Secrets or lies, and maybe both
- The Usual Suspects
- Irresponsible and Obscene
- Fox News Presents! The War On Darkies
- Guffaws for Bush's Immigration Speech
- The New York Times Cover-Up Continues
- Joe Klein Plays The Conyers Card
- Rising Diabetes Threat Meets a Falling Budget - Ne...
- Fw: Nuclear Iran: Didn't the U.S. Already Try This...
- Losing The War On Terror?
- More Bogeymen
- America the Titanic
- Heckuva Job, Dubya
- Karl and George's not-so-excellent adventure
- They Knew It Was Illegal
- Dangerous Liaison
- FBI Acknowledges: Journalists Phone Records are Fa...
- An indictmen watch, but what about Cheney?
- America the Fearful - New York TimesThe New York T...
- Bill Maher's Message to the President
- D for Debacle - New York TimesThe New York TimesMa...
- Fw: Urgent Alert on Climate Change: Ask Your Repr...
- ABC report: Government is tracking reporters' calls
- Americans support NSA program? Not so fast.
- NSA Sweep "Waste of Time" Analyst Says
- Bush to Propose Guard Troops for Border
- Maverick--or panderer?
- Just like Carmela Soprano...
- Will the Real Traitors Please Stand Up? - New York...
- Allah Akbar?
- Rove Indicted!
- White House, NSA Block Investigation of Spying
- A Coming Tsunami--The Republican's Bankruptcy of I...
- Joe Lieberman: The Collapse of a Paper Tiger
- Mentally Ill Troops Kept In Combat
-
▼
May
(164)
No comments:
Post a Comment