Published on Sunday, February 5, 2006 by the Toronto Sun (Canada)
The Bush team should have known Hamas would get elected. Now it should quit the name-calling
by Eric Margolis
After Hamas' stunning victory last week in Palestinian elections, a flustered U.S. Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, tried to explain the Bush administration's latest Mideast fiasco.
"I've asked why nobody saw it coming," she offered plaintively.
Dear Miss Condi, many of us saw Hamas' victory coming. You didn't because you failed to face facts.
Your boss, George W. Bush, made similar lame excuses trying to explain his embarrassing failure to find WMD in Iraq by claiming all western intelligence services believed Iraq had them -- which was untrue.
For a nation that spends $40 billion annually on intelligence to be so wrong about so much is utterly inexcusable. Condi, go stand in the corner with Colin Powell.
Hamas won because of Washington's total failure to push Israel into any meaningful concessions under its dead-ended "Road Map to Peace," fatally undermining Bush's favourite, Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas and his Fatah party.
Palestinians were fed up with corrupt Fatah leadership which appeared too cozy with the U.S. and Israel. The more Washington bribed or arm-twisted Fatah leaders to comply with its wishes, the more Palestinians backed hardline Hamas. The feuding ninnies and crooks running Fatah stood in sharp contrast to Hamas' disciplined, efficient, uncorrupt cadres.
When it became clear Israel's leadership would continue PM Ariel Sharon's plans to colonize the West Bank and confine Arabs in three isolated tribal reservations, Palestinians voted for Hamas.
Why didn't Rice see this obvious fact? Because, like the rest of the administration and U.S. media, her view of the Mideast is warped by ignorance, inexperience, and intense pressure from neoconservatives and religious groups pressing for a crusade against the Muslim world.
Misinformed
America's shocked reaction to Hamas' win shows how misinformed and misled it is about the Mideast.
The propaganda term "terrorism" has so fuddled the minds of Americans that any rational analysis of Mideast events has become as impossible, as it was during the 1950s and '60s to rationally analyze enormous developments within the communist world, like the Sino-Soviet split.
Hamas' victory provoked hysteria in New York City last week. Local papers trumpeted, "Terror Nation," and "Terror Wins," absurdly claiming Hamas threatens the very existence of Israel.
Hamas is responsible for many criminal bombings of Israeli civilians. It refuses to recognize the existence of the Jewish state. Israel and the U.S. brand Hamas as "terrorists," but to Palestinians, Hamas are reformers and resisters of occupation.
2,000 riflemen
Hamas has around 2,000 men with rifles. Israel has 200 nuclear weapons, armed forces of 568,000, 3,687 tanks, 10,400 armored fighting vehicles, 5,432 heavy guns, and 402 superb combat aircraft. Hamas bombers have killed Jewish civilians, but they do not threaten the Jewish state.
During the intifada, twice as many Arab civilians have been killed as Jewish civilians. Ironically, Israel helped create Hamas to rival the PLO, and aided creation of Hezbollah in Lebanon.
The Arab world has suffered some of the world's most brutal and corrupt regimes. Mideasterners yearn for honest governments that represent them, not foreign interests. Islamic parties appear to offer these qualities, though they have yet to be proven.
In the only fair election before Palestine -- in Algeria, 1991 -- Islamists won a landslide. Algeria's military junta declared martial law and annulled the vote, igniting a ghastly civil war that killed 150,000.
It's both sad and amusing watching the White House, which has championed democracy as a cure-all to its Mideast problems, threaten to cut off aid and contacts with a new democratic government because it disagrees with Washington.
Cutting aid will only strengthen Hamas.
Hamas needs to renounce bombing. The U.S. and Israel need to begin talking to Hamas' moderate wing.
Name-calling is not policy.
Contributors
Links
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(1766)
-
▼
February
(99)
- Bush's Carnival Tricks
- Why the Dubai port deal is dangerous to America
- Violence in Iraq, despair back home
- Bush and the Truthiness Taliban
- Somewhat Ironic, No?
- For Inspiration
- The President and the Ports
- John McCain: Any Port in a Storm
- Conspiracy 101
- Cheney and the Late Night Comics
- Iranian advisor: We'll strike Dimona in response t...
- Bush, Rats & a Sinking Ship
- GOP Says Bush Critics Hate America - Look Who's Ha...
- The Boy Who Cried Wolf
- They've Gotten The White House Talking Points
- The names have been changed to protect the guilty
- Fw: Nuclear Weapons: Oppose a Bad Nuclear Deal wit...
- White House/UAE "secret agreement"
- Destroying the Clean Water Act
- U.S. terror fears, stoked by Bush, now bite him
- Iraq's 9/11, or a step toward civil war?
- "Big Brother" watching e-mail, computer data: US r...
- The Dirty Little Secret Behind the UAE Port Securi...
- Our God is Better than Your God!! Or Wait Till you...
- Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee
- A Test for the New Justices
- Cheers and Jeers
- At Duke's place, bribery was on the menu
- On the Waterfront: Time to Give Ports Back to the ...
- The Mensch Gap - New York TimesThe New York TimesF...
- The dying scandal that keeps growing
- After Neoconservatism
- Don't Punish the Palestinians
- Permanent Bases In Iraq
- Bush's Policies Don't Promote Growth
- What It Means To Be A Republican
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Can Cheney be his own Declassification Machine?
- Judge Orders Spying Documents Released
- DeWine: "We don't want to have any kind of debate ...
- Rx for GOP doom
- In the Mideast, the Third Way Is a Myth
- Cheney's got a girlfriend
- Cheney, "A Beer or Two," and A Gun
- Leaders Lead
- Shoot first, avoid questions later
- Even the Right Say's It's Wrong
- Let the Whitewashing Begin
- If It's Sunday, It's Conservative
- Dream On, Condi
- So Who's Really Full of B(uck) S(hot)?
- U.S. Has Royalty Plan to Give Windfall to Oil Comp...
- Was Cheney Drunk?
- Bush in the GOP Crosshairs
- Rumsfeld and Cheney Revive Their 70's Terror Playbook
- With no word from Cheney, "The Daily Show" stands in
- Not a Laughing Matter
- Democrat Questions Cheney's Role In Leak
- American Bar Association To Oppose Domestic Spying
- Senators: Cheney Should Be Probed In Leak
- Katrina Report Spreads Blame
- Laura Bush: Hillary's Criticism is Out of Bounds
- The Trust Gap
- Bob Barr, Bane of the Right?
- White House Debuts Iraq War Infomercial
- The Beginning of the End?
- Ex-CIA Official Faults Use of Data on Iraq Intelli...
- Bush's Propaganda Alert: Code Red
- Wiretaps fail to make dent in terror war
- The Parent Trap - New York TimesThe New York Times...
- Lieberman's Lapdog Act Not Playing Well
- Gonzales Says "Just Trust Us"
- On the President's Warrantless Wiretapping Program
- Fw: Traumatic Brain Injury Program Is Zero-Funded ...
- The Real Bush Energy Plan
- Burn, Baby, Burn - New York TimesThe New York Time...
- Fw: Federal Budget Choices: State Security or Huma...
- Is George Bush Opening Your Mail?
- Rove counting heads on the Senate Judiciary Committee
- Spying, torture - - is it all hypothetical?
- Bush Team: Again, Not Too Bright
- Joint Chiefs wield mighty pen
- The CIA Leak: Plame Was Still Covert
- A 9/11 Conspirator in King Bush's Court?
- Last Gasp of a Lame Duck
- Iraq war is costing $100,000 per minute
- Fw: Walmart
- A Boehner in the Henhouse
- Iraq, NIger, And The CIA
- Life in the New Amerika
- Administration backs off Bush's vow to reduce Mide...
- What Really Happened
- 9/11 Attacks: Avoiding the Hard Questions
- Money for nothing, chicks for free
- Kucinich Blasts Bush's State of the Union
- Is the World Safer Today?
- Bush on spying, or the "duty to speak with candor"...
- Same old song
- Illegal wiretaps could've prevented 9-11? Not quit...
-
▼
February
(99)
No comments:
Post a Comment