Published on Sunday, March 19, 2006 by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (Wisconsin)
by Gregory Stanford
In Washington, crazy is normal, and normal is crazy.
President Bush and his people adopt a lunatic theory about preventive war, conjure out of Saddam Hussein's non-existent nuclear arsenal a paranoid vision of an imminent mushroom cloud over an American city, start a real war with make-believe planning (and disastrous consequences), keep giving the war rosy prognoses unhinged from the grim reality and suffer delusions of monarchism in which King George has inalienable rights to torture prisoners and wiretap citizens without court oversight, despite laws to the contrary.
A lone lawmaker has put forth a modest proposal to counter this last excess. Sen. Russ Feingold, the Wisconsin Democrat, has asked his colleagues to censure Bush - that is, to pass a resolution rebuking him for illegally spying on Americans.
Now, guess who's drawn the verbal brickbats, such as "out of line," "overreaching," "irresponsible," "outrageous," "crazy." Amazingly, Feingold has.
Were the administration a car, it would be careening through city streets at high speed, getting into crashes, often fatal, as it went. But the authorities would treat this crazy driving as normal and the sane lawman who wants to issue the motorist a ticket as crazy.
How do Bush and his minions get away with turning reality so inside out? Surely, their misadventures would have sunk previous administrations - giving, for instance, the Republican Congress real reasons to impeach President Clinton.
No doubt, Washington's one-party rule gets much of the blame. Besides the White House, the Republicans own Congress and the courts - weakening the formal checks on presidential power. Hence, the Senate Intelligence Committee has dragged its feet on probing whether the administration misused intelligence in beating the drums for the Iraq war.
In a healthy two-party system, Congress would have held, if not an impeachment inquiry, at least sober hearings on a host of administration misdeeds, from stifling scientific data that don't fit its views to failing to plan for a postwar Iraq.
Another factor is that the party in charge is the GOP. Some of the undisciplined Democrats in Congress would have surely broken ranks with an administration as reckless as Bush's is. But the Republicans in Congress seem to put party loyalty above all else, including the nation's welfare.
A third factor is the weak-kneed out party, the Democrats, whom Republicans have learned they can cow simply by shouting "terrorism."
The Dems live in fear that if they don't support Bush, they would be painted as weak in the war against terrorism.
They must overcome that fear, which is ludicrous anyway, in light of how badly Bush has botched that war.
The prez fancies himself a Captain Midnight. But he's more an Inspector Clouseau - except that 1) Bush's team tries to keep his stumbles off-
screen and 2) the missteps are not funny because they are so herculean and consequential.
Al Gore, or just about any other president of either party, would likely have dealt al-Qaida a fatal blow and captured Osama bin Laden dead or alive with the help of America's friends around the world in the wake of the terrorist attack on America on Sept. 11, 2001. Likely, too, such an administration would have better heeded prior warnings about the attack.
But the Bush administration fell flat both times due to its obsession with Iraq. Much of the world had rallied around America after 9-11 - support Bush chased away with his fixation on invading a nation that had nothing to do with the attack.
Besides alienating friends, the Iraq war has fanned terrorism and distracted from the war we must wage against our mortal enemy, al-Qaida. Worrisomely, that group's ally, the Taliban, is resurging in Afghanistan.
Democrats ought to eagerly talk about Bush's mishandling of the war on terrorism. In being so meek on the topic, they are betraying their role as an opposition party. They strengthen the hand of the Bush administration, which they leave free to define the war in a way that makes crazy normal and normal crazy.
Sure, Feingold knows his resolution will get nowhere. But it has stirred up a debate, much of it healthy, in that it points to the dangers of one-party rule, particularly when the ins put party loyalty ahead of the nation's welfare and the outs refuse to fight back.
Contributors
Links
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(1766)
-
▼
March
(153)
- The Road to Dubai - New York TimesThe New York Tim...
- Ned Lamont: the unlikely insurgent
- Immigration Follies
- What Bush knew, when he knew it
- "Saddam chose to deny inspectors"
- Five minutes to midnight
- Poll: Opposition to Gay Marriage Declining
- Moment of Truth
- "Latino Giant" Awakens
- Democrats To Unveil "Real Security" Plan
- Lieberman faces tough fight
- Progressive vision for all of the Americas
- Rich Yet Broke
- McCain's embrace, Halliburton's profits and Tom De...
- Rove, "Out of touch."
- Fw: "I think we will be here forever", says a U.S....
- The White House shake-up that wasn't
- Impeachment? Hell, no. Impalement.
- Rove "Cooperating"
- Rumsfeld and the Big Picture
- Detainees' Rights-Scalia Speaks His Mind
- Woman With Perfect Memory Baffles Scientists
- North of the Border - New York TimesThe New York T...
- Anti-War Groups Monitored
- That's Sicilian!
- The Voice of Fear and the Voice of Hope
- On Torture and Being Good Americans
- Does This Mean Saddam Wasn't Responsible for 9/11?
- "Crashing The Gate"
- Bush Makes Iraq the Vital Reason for his Impeachme...
- Bush backlash
- Shiite Death Squads Out of Control
- Solving Cuba's Katrina Donation Problem
- Bush Wants to Make IMF and World Bank Even Worse
- The Procrastinator-in-Chief
- Look Who's Talking!
- Why we can no longer afford George W. Bush
- Anti-Bush Cries Get Louder
- NSA Could've Monitored Lawyers' Calls
- "Nonprofit" Profits
- Feingold Stands Alone Again When Standing on Princ...
- Retraining Laid-Off Workers, but for What?
- Letter to the Secretary - New York Times
- But They Voted For This Government....
- Good Versus Evil Isn't A Strategy
- Bush Shuns Patriot Act Requirement
- Fw: Outsourcing
- How long can you tread water?
- Downtime with Dick
- Apocalyptic President
- Rumsfeld shows no sign he's ready to leave
- Changing the Script
- The Ground Zero Grassy Knoll
- No Light in the Tunnel
- Israel Lobby Dictates U.S. Policy, Study Charges
- Criminalizing Illegal Immigration
- What Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld Have Wrought
- Liberators?
- Unstoppable?
- Fighting the Wrong War
- The President Still in Denial
- Why Cheney won't go
- The president and the straw man
- America's Blinders
- The Gall of Bush
- Bernie Sanders Interview
- Lawmakers get out of the Hous
- The president's greatest hits
- Bush Using Straw-Man Arguments in Speeches
- Shame
- Reminds me of "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Amer...
- Fw: Entering the Fourth Year of War and Occupation...
- "Don't talk about it; be about it."
- Meanwhile . . .
- How to spot a baby Conservative
- Carlos Santana Speaks Out Against Bush
- The Democrats . . . Still Ducking
- Rumsfeld Is "Absolutely Crazy"
- Still Optimistic About Iraq? You Just Might Be a F...
- Rewriting the Science
- Worst Presidency in History
- Huh? Feingold's the Careless, Reckless One?
- The Iraq War: Three Years Later
- The battle to ban birth control
- Adios IMF
- Bush vs. Clean Air Act
- An A for Vendetta
- Bush vs. Clean Air Act
- "Hanoi Jane"
- Three Years and Counting
- Task Force 6-26
- Digby Speak
- The Last Days of the Ocean
- What Might Have Been
- Losing Ground
- Clear and Present Dangers
- Three Years Later
- More Rough 'n' Ready Russ
- The "Long War"? Oh, Goodie
- The New York Times Shills Again
-
▼
March
(153)
No comments:
Post a Comment