Posted on Sun, Mar. 19, 2006
Philadelphia Inquirer Editorial
An incomplete mission, a war-weary nation
At the onset of the war in Iraq, Americans were anxious but supportive of President Bush sending the U.S. military to the Persian Gulf to topple the dangerous regime of Saddam Hussein. That invasion began three years ago today.
A March 2003 poll from the Program on International Policy Studies showed 66 percent of Americans favored invading Iraq; 32 percent opposed it. No close call there.
In 2006, it is clear that Bush's war has done one good thing: rid Iraq of Hussein, who terrorized his own people and threatened neighboring nations. The bad man of Baghdad can do little more now than shoot verbal volleys at the judges presiding over his trial.
But Bush cannot claim that this war has so far achieved any other U.S. goal. To the contrary, his administration's poor judgment and mistake-prone conduct of the occupation have made Americans less safe.
The war has been a boon to jihadi recruitment and the spread of extremist Islamic ideologies.
It also has harmed America's ability to influence world affairs. The United States has been ineffective on a number of issues recently.
Bush has not been able to gain international agreement to confront the genocide in Darfur. He has come away from gatherings in Chile and China with precious little achieved on crucial economic matters.
The administration has failed to get the operational reforms it seeks for the United Nations. Washington has been a backbencher in efforts to resolve the Iranian nuclear standoff.
Other factors intrude upon these issues. The heavy-handed style of John Bolton, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, discourages coalition-building. China and Russia routinely impede the U.N. Security Council from taking needed action against nations that behave badly.
Still, these last three years have created new critics of the United States and emboldened old foes. These last three years have eroded America's prestige.
Before Iraq, said Steven C. Clemons, a useful mystique surrounded the strength of the United States. Clemons heads foreign policy studies at the New America Foundation.
Rogue nations such as Iran didn't know the boundaries of our power. This blundering war of choice in Iraq has revealed them.
Iran's mullahs know that the United States, no matter what President Bush says, lacks the military and economic resources to start a grand fight with Tehran.
The leaders of many of our closest allies, including British Prime Minister Tony Blair, cannot side too closely with the United States without risking an uproar from their antiwar publics at home.
In his second term, Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice have shown a new realization about the importance of diplomacy. But they are working with far less leverage than before.
Americans' trust in the President and his ability to stabilize Iraq is evaporating. A Program on International Policy Studies survey released last week showed that 54 percent of Americans now believe the administration made the wrong decision when it invaded Iraq. That's quite a drop from 2003.
The United States has backed itself into a corner in world affairs - and on how it should proceed in Iraq.
To leave now, as sectarian violence grows, could allow a full-blown civil war to erupt and spill over throughout the region. Terrorism breeds inside such chaos. That prospect likely is behind the current military offensive around Baghdad, and planned U.S.-Iran talks on Iraq.
We helped make this mess; we have a moral obligation to try to leave Iraq in one piece. It is not an endless obligation, though. By the summer, it should be apparent whether Iraqi leaders can form a unity government that shuns violence.
With each U.S. or allied soldier killed, with each Iraqi civilian gunned down, with each bomb that tears a wider divide between Shiites and Sunnis, the burden grows on Bush to show Americans why the United States should stay in Iraq.
Contributors
Links
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(1766)
-
▼
March
(153)
- The Road to Dubai - New York TimesThe New York Tim...
- Ned Lamont: the unlikely insurgent
- Immigration Follies
- What Bush knew, when he knew it
- "Saddam chose to deny inspectors"
- Five minutes to midnight
- Poll: Opposition to Gay Marriage Declining
- Moment of Truth
- "Latino Giant" Awakens
- Democrats To Unveil "Real Security" Plan
- Lieberman faces tough fight
- Progressive vision for all of the Americas
- Rich Yet Broke
- McCain's embrace, Halliburton's profits and Tom De...
- Rove, "Out of touch."
- Fw: "I think we will be here forever", says a U.S....
- The White House shake-up that wasn't
- Impeachment? Hell, no. Impalement.
- Rove "Cooperating"
- Rumsfeld and the Big Picture
- Detainees' Rights-Scalia Speaks His Mind
- Woman With Perfect Memory Baffles Scientists
- North of the Border - New York TimesThe New York T...
- Anti-War Groups Monitored
- That's Sicilian!
- The Voice of Fear and the Voice of Hope
- On Torture and Being Good Americans
- Does This Mean Saddam Wasn't Responsible for 9/11?
- "Crashing The Gate"
- Bush Makes Iraq the Vital Reason for his Impeachme...
- Bush backlash
- Shiite Death Squads Out of Control
- Solving Cuba's Katrina Donation Problem
- Bush Wants to Make IMF and World Bank Even Worse
- The Procrastinator-in-Chief
- Look Who's Talking!
- Why we can no longer afford George W. Bush
- Anti-Bush Cries Get Louder
- NSA Could've Monitored Lawyers' Calls
- "Nonprofit" Profits
- Feingold Stands Alone Again When Standing on Princ...
- Retraining Laid-Off Workers, but for What?
- Letter to the Secretary - New York Times
- But They Voted For This Government....
- Good Versus Evil Isn't A Strategy
- Bush Shuns Patriot Act Requirement
- Fw: Outsourcing
- How long can you tread water?
- Downtime with Dick
- Apocalyptic President
- Rumsfeld shows no sign he's ready to leave
- Changing the Script
- The Ground Zero Grassy Knoll
- No Light in the Tunnel
- Israel Lobby Dictates U.S. Policy, Study Charges
- Criminalizing Illegal Immigration
- What Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld Have Wrought
- Liberators?
- Unstoppable?
- Fighting the Wrong War
- The President Still in Denial
- Why Cheney won't go
- The president and the straw man
- America's Blinders
- The Gall of Bush
- Bernie Sanders Interview
- Lawmakers get out of the Hous
- The president's greatest hits
- Bush Using Straw-Man Arguments in Speeches
- Shame
- Reminds me of "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Amer...
- Fw: Entering the Fourth Year of War and Occupation...
- "Don't talk about it; be about it."
- Meanwhile . . .
- How to spot a baby Conservative
- Carlos Santana Speaks Out Against Bush
- The Democrats . . . Still Ducking
- Rumsfeld Is "Absolutely Crazy"
- Still Optimistic About Iraq? You Just Might Be a F...
- Rewriting the Science
- Worst Presidency in History
- Huh? Feingold's the Careless, Reckless One?
- The Iraq War: Three Years Later
- The battle to ban birth control
- Adios IMF
- Bush vs. Clean Air Act
- An A for Vendetta
- Bush vs. Clean Air Act
- "Hanoi Jane"
- Three Years and Counting
- Task Force 6-26
- Digby Speak
- The Last Days of the Ocean
- What Might Have Been
- Losing Ground
- Clear and Present Dangers
- Three Years Later
- More Rough 'n' Ready Russ
- The "Long War"? Oh, Goodie
- The New York Times Shills Again
-
▼
March
(153)
No comments:
Post a Comment