by Tim Grieve
It's the sort of thing that happens when your approval rating starts flirting with 30 percent: A few paragraphs into a story on your plan to combat high gas prices, the New York Times reveals that you announced the plan after taking a 14-car motorcade across town and past an Exxon station where the cheapest gas was going for $3.29 a gallon.
George W. Bush came out fighting on gas prices today, but the man once hailed as a strong leader came across as a follower instead. Two weeks ago, Senate Democrats asked Bush to join them in supporting legislation aimed at preventing and prosecuting price gouging in the energy markets. After seeing the polls and hearing complaints from constituents during their spring break, Republicans in the House and Senate returned to Washington Monday and immediately asked Bush to order the attorney general and the Federal Trade Commission to open investigations into price-gouging allegations.
The president finally took up the call today, saying that he was directing the Department of Justice to work with the FTC and the Energy Department to investigate any "manipulation or cheating related to the current gasoline prices." But even as he demanded that oil companies treat American consumers fairly, he took steps to make it easier for them to profit by temporarily suspending certain environmental regulations.
As Raw Story is reporting, Senate Democrats may urge relief at the other end of the pump by calling for a 60-day suspension of the 18 cents-per-gallon federal gasoline tax. The Democrats' proposal would make up for the lost tax revenue by eliminating $6 billion in tax breaks for oil companies. Bush has already signaled that the plan is a nonstarter: Although he said today that oil companies don't need all the tax breaks they're getting, he said he's asking Congress to trim those breaks by just $2 billion over the next 10 years.
Bush also announced today that he'll do something he once ripped into Al Gore for even suggesting: use the nation's Strategic Petroleum Reserve as a way to increase oil supply and cut prices. Gore proposed dipping into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve in September 2000 in order to cut prices on home heating oil and bring gas prices down from what was then a shockingly high $2 a gallon. As Think Progress notes, candidate Bush called the plan an "election year ploy" that would threaten national security. "The Strategic Reserve is an insurance policy meant for a sudden disruption of our energy supply or for war," Bush said then. "Strategic Reserve should not be used as an attempt to drive down oil prices right before an election. It should not be used for short-term political gain at the cost of long-term national security."
Yet here we are, just months away from another election, and the same George W. Bush says he'll use the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to drive down oil prices. "One immediate way we can signal to people we're serious about increasing supply is to stop making purchases or deposits to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve for a short period of time," Bush said. "I've directed the Department of Energy to defer filling the reserve this summer. Our strategic reserve is sufficiently large enough to guard against any major supply disruption over the next few months. So by deferring deposits until the fall, we'll leave a little more oil on the market. Every little bit helps."
How about the little bit required to fuel that 14-car motorcade?
Contributors
Links
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(1766)
-
▼
April
(137)
- The Rehabilitation of the Cold-War Liberal - New Y...
- The Criminal In Chief
- Colbert Lampoons Bush at White House Correspondent...
- War Costs Skyrocket
- Republicans Involved In Lobbyist Sex Scandal
- Chicken Hawks Come Home To Roost
- He Wasn't A Bush Appointee, Was He? I Can't Belie...
- Next they'll want us to eat chips and salsa....
- Time To Smell The Coffee
- Fueling their Anxiety
- A Gouging Market
- The power to do nothing about fuel economy
- Web sites I like
- There Is A God!
- "My job is to make decisions"
- The Rape of the Working Class
- For Rove, a time to panic?
- Bush does something right
- Fw: BREAKING: Iraq Debate Announced
- David Brock on New White House press secretary Ton...
- Bin Laden/China
- The Passion of George W. Bush
- A Prius in Every Pot - New York TimesThe New York ...
- Go West, Old Men - New York TimesThe New York Time...
- Priceless....
- Fw: Success! A major step towards satellite voting...
- Lyrics to Neil Young's "Let's Impeach the President"
- Rove lawyer: My client is not a target
- Meanwhile, a word about impeachment
- Bush, following and flip-flopping, takes a stand o...
- We told you so...
- Iraq: A Handy Rebuttal to the "We Have to Finish t...
- Top 10 Conservative Idiots
- 1000 Days To Go with FuckStick George
- Save The Internet
- Halliburton Project Not Completed; Just A Coincide...
- CSI: Trade Deficit - New York TimesThe New York Ti...
- On Waking Up Sleepless in the Middle of the Night
- Documentary: Giuliani Time
- Intelligence on Iran nuclear threat seen as inadeq...
- More Torture
- 2006 elections stakes: investigations of everything
- If Past Is Prologue, George Bush Is Becoming An In...
- Fitz vs. Turd Blossom?
- Lawyer: Rice Allegedly Leaked Defense Info
- AIPAC judge approve Rice subpoena
- The Great Revulsion - New York TimesThe New York T...
- Fw: Iraq Dispatches: Save the Internet
- Free Speech?
- Beware the Bombing of Iran
- Walking the White House Plank
- Attacking Iran: Are they nuts?
- Fw: Peace in Iraq Call-In Day Monday 4/24 - FCNL
- The Nuclear Power Beside Iraq
- $10 Billion per Month-Feeling Safer Yet?
- Bush's Nutty Nuclear Braggadocio
- The questions McClellan never answered
- The "Decider"
- Fw: Chinese President Comes to Washington: What Ne...
- Rumsfeld Shouldn't Be Fired. He Should Be Indicted.
- Recipe for Holy War: Add Two Nut Jobs and Stir
- A Supreme Mutiny
- RNC's Immigration Bamboozle
- Bombs That Would Backfire
- Scalia: The disorderly justice
- With Tax Break Expired, Middle Class Faces a Great...
- Neil Young Records "Impeach the President" Song
- Blair refuses to back Iran strike
- Documents Link Rumsfeld to Prisoner's Interrogation
- Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship
- Cracks in The Constitution?
- The slow-motion trap
- The Human Costs of Bombing Iran
- If You Liked the Iraq War, You'll Love the Iran War
- Problems mount from 9-11 fallout
- Reid fights back
- Bush's bluster
- Analysts Say a Nuclear Iran Is Years Away - New Yo...
- Seeds of a future coup?
- Stinkin Liberal State Offers Health Insurance To A...
- Are We Really Going To Nuke Iran?
- Bush: Idiot and Liar?
- Bush and the Constant State of War
- Cheney at the ballpark: They weren't yelling Bruuu...
- Now Powell Tells Us
- Yes He Would
- Bush/Cheney in the Crosshairs
- Phone-Jamming Records Point to White House
- Democrats . . . Si!
- THE IRAN PLANS
- A leak about the leak, but more questions than ans...
- An October Surprise?
- Bush Critics Alarmed over Reports of Possible Stri...
- When Will Democrats Break With Bush?
- Libby testimony shows a White House pattern of int...
- Republican Senator Says Bush, Cheney Should Explai...
- Fool Me Twice
- U.S. Considers Use of Nuclear Weapons Against Iran
- Cheney at center of effort to discredit
- Libby, Gonzales Provied More Grounds for Censure o...
-
▼
April
(137)
No comments:
Post a Comment