by Tim Grieve
George W. Bush has a plan to address the staggeringly high prices Americans are paying at the pump, and it won't come as a surprise to anyone who's been paying attention: Give me more power.
Posing in front of a gas station in Biloxi, Miss., Thursday, Bush said Congress should give his administration "a capacity to raise CAFE standards on automobiles." The president noted that he already has such authority when it comes to light trucks, and he vowed to use the power "wisely" if Congress extends it to cars as well.
Notice what the president didn't say: While he said he wants the power to increase fuel-economy standards for cars, he didn't say anything to suggest that he'd use that power to, you know, increase fuel-economy standards for cars. You'd think that maybe it was implied in what he said -- why talk about fuel-economy standards in the course of a discussion of gas prices unless you're talking about raising those standards? -- but the Bush administration's track record on the issue suggests otherwise.
Last summer, Transportation Secretary Norm Mineta unveiled the Bush administration's new CAFE standards for light trucks. Rather than raising standards across the board, Mineta said the administration would be creating six subgroups of trucks, each with its own fuel-economy requirement. The result: Automakers would be free to continue to build massive, gas-guzzling SUVs without having to worry about offsetting their consumption by offering more oil- and environment-responsible minivans and smaller trucks. And the largest of the large SUVs? They're not even included in the administration's CAFE standards until 2011.
So while it's high time for somebody to do something about the standard for automobiles -- it hasn't changed since 1990 -- there's little reason to believe that the Bush administration would actually do so. Indeed, even as Bush is pushing for the power to set fuel-economy standards for cars, the White House is making it clear -- don't worry, Detroit! -- that Bush won't be rushing off to raise any requirements. In a letter to Congress, Mineta says that simply increasing CAFE standards for cars might increase fatalities and raise healthcare costs by prompting automakers to make smaller, lighter and less safe vehicles. "As a result," Mineta says, "the administration would oppose any increase in passenger car CAFE standards without corresponding reform."
Other administration aides said that Bush might ultimately support higher fuel-economy standards for cars but only after what the Detroit Free Press called a "scientific review." And if you've been following the Bush administration's handiwork on, say, global warming or the morning-after pill, you know exactly what that means.
Contributors
Links
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(1766)
-
▼
April
(137)
- The Rehabilitation of the Cold-War Liberal - New Y...
- The Criminal In Chief
- Colbert Lampoons Bush at White House Correspondent...
- War Costs Skyrocket
- Republicans Involved In Lobbyist Sex Scandal
- Chicken Hawks Come Home To Roost
- He Wasn't A Bush Appointee, Was He? I Can't Belie...
- Next they'll want us to eat chips and salsa....
- Time To Smell The Coffee
- Fueling their Anxiety
- A Gouging Market
- The power to do nothing about fuel economy
- Web sites I like
- There Is A God!
- "My job is to make decisions"
- The Rape of the Working Class
- For Rove, a time to panic?
- Bush does something right
- Fw: BREAKING: Iraq Debate Announced
- David Brock on New White House press secretary Ton...
- Bin Laden/China
- The Passion of George W. Bush
- A Prius in Every Pot - New York TimesThe New York ...
- Go West, Old Men - New York TimesThe New York Time...
- Priceless....
- Fw: Success! A major step towards satellite voting...
- Lyrics to Neil Young's "Let's Impeach the President"
- Rove lawyer: My client is not a target
- Meanwhile, a word about impeachment
- Bush, following and flip-flopping, takes a stand o...
- We told you so...
- Iraq: A Handy Rebuttal to the "We Have to Finish t...
- Top 10 Conservative Idiots
- 1000 Days To Go with FuckStick George
- Save The Internet
- Halliburton Project Not Completed; Just A Coincide...
- CSI: Trade Deficit - New York TimesThe New York Ti...
- On Waking Up Sleepless in the Middle of the Night
- Documentary: Giuliani Time
- Intelligence on Iran nuclear threat seen as inadeq...
- More Torture
- 2006 elections stakes: investigations of everything
- If Past Is Prologue, George Bush Is Becoming An In...
- Fitz vs. Turd Blossom?
- Lawyer: Rice Allegedly Leaked Defense Info
- AIPAC judge approve Rice subpoena
- The Great Revulsion - New York TimesThe New York T...
- Fw: Iraq Dispatches: Save the Internet
- Free Speech?
- Beware the Bombing of Iran
- Walking the White House Plank
- Attacking Iran: Are they nuts?
- Fw: Peace in Iraq Call-In Day Monday 4/24 - FCNL
- The Nuclear Power Beside Iraq
- $10 Billion per Month-Feeling Safer Yet?
- Bush's Nutty Nuclear Braggadocio
- The questions McClellan never answered
- The "Decider"
- Fw: Chinese President Comes to Washington: What Ne...
- Rumsfeld Shouldn't Be Fired. He Should Be Indicted.
- Recipe for Holy War: Add Two Nut Jobs and Stir
- A Supreme Mutiny
- RNC's Immigration Bamboozle
- Bombs That Would Backfire
- Scalia: The disorderly justice
- With Tax Break Expired, Middle Class Faces a Great...
- Neil Young Records "Impeach the President" Song
- Blair refuses to back Iran strike
- Documents Link Rumsfeld to Prisoner's Interrogation
- Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship
- Cracks in The Constitution?
- The slow-motion trap
- The Human Costs of Bombing Iran
- If You Liked the Iraq War, You'll Love the Iran War
- Problems mount from 9-11 fallout
- Reid fights back
- Bush's bluster
- Analysts Say a Nuclear Iran Is Years Away - New Yo...
- Seeds of a future coup?
- Stinkin Liberal State Offers Health Insurance To A...
- Are We Really Going To Nuke Iran?
- Bush: Idiot and Liar?
- Bush and the Constant State of War
- Cheney at the ballpark: They weren't yelling Bruuu...
- Now Powell Tells Us
- Yes He Would
- Bush/Cheney in the Crosshairs
- Phone-Jamming Records Point to White House
- Democrats . . . Si!
- THE IRAN PLANS
- A leak about the leak, but more questions than ans...
- An October Surprise?
- Bush Critics Alarmed over Reports of Possible Stri...
- When Will Democrats Break With Bush?
- Libby testimony shows a White House pattern of int...
- Republican Senator Says Bush, Cheney Should Explai...
- Fool Me Twice
- U.S. Considers Use of Nuclear Weapons Against Iran
- Cheney at center of effort to discredit
- Libby, Gonzales Provied More Grounds for Censure o...
-
▼
April
(137)
No comments:
Post a Comment