The New York Times
April 12, 2006
Massachusetts Governor Signs Health Care Bill
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
BOSTON (AP) -- Gov. Mitt Romney signed legislation Wednesday that would make Massachusetts the first state to require everyone to have health insurance, just as drivers must have automobile coverage.
The law would make Massachusetts the only state with universal health coverage, employing a combination of subsidies and penalties to make insurance more affordable and to force people to buy it, too.
However, Romney vetoed a section imposing an annual $295-per-worker fee on businesses that do not provide their employees with coverage.
The law has thrust the state to the forefront of the national debate over how to extend coverage to the uninsured without creating a single government-controlled system. Massachusetts has an estimated 550,000 uninsured.
The program is a potential political coup for Romney as he weighs a possible run for the Republican presidential nomination in 2008.
"The reason this is so landmark is that we have found a way, collectively, to get all of our citizens insurance without some new government-mandated takeover or a huge new tax program," he said.
The governor said the program would be financed largely with the millions of dollars that the state now spends on uncompensated medical care for poor people who show up at hospitals and clinics without health insurance.
By July 2007, everyone in Massachusetts will have to have health insurance.
Under the plan, the state will offer free or heavily subsidized coverage to poor and lower-income people. Those who can afford insurance but still refuse to get it will face escalating tax penalties. For example, they will lose the ability to claim a personal exemption on their state tax returns. That would cost an individual about $189 and a couple filing jointly about $378.
Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., who attended the signing ceremony in Boston's historic Fanueil Hall, praised Romney for giving the state "just what the doctor ordered."
"With the signing of this landmark health reform bill, after so many years of false starts, our actions have finally matched our words and we have lived up to our ideals," Kennedy said.
The cost of the program was put at $316 million in the first year, rising to more than a $1 billion in the third year, with much of that money coming from federal reimbursements and existing state spending, officials said.
About $125 million in new money will come from the state's general fund each of the three years. The $295 per-employee assessment would have brought in a maximum of $45 million a year.
Romney used his line-item veto power to strike eight portions of the bill, most significantly the $295 fee. Administration officials said the fee could actually discourage registration for the new health program, since some employers might consider it cheaper to pay the fee than to insure workers.
"It's a very small feature of this bill. It's a very insignificant and unnecessary and, in some respects, counterproductive element of this bill," Romney said in an interview Tuesday. "It applies to a tiny number of employers, and it raises a very small amount of money relative to the scale of this entire proposal. So I don't think it's necessary."
Leaders of the heavily Democratic state Legislature said they would override any changes proposed by the governor.
"To change anything will disturb the delicate balance that made this law possible," House Speaker Salvatore DiMasi said. "Each and every element of this law is critical to accomplishing our intentions and goals."
Business and hospital leaders also criticized the veto of the fee. Massachusetts Hospital Association President Ron Hollander said it threatened the balance of the bill.
"I think it is important that all the parts and all the parties stay together," he said. "The employer assessment is critical."
Contributors
Links
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(1766)
-
▼
April
(137)
- The Rehabilitation of the Cold-War Liberal - New Y...
- The Criminal In Chief
- Colbert Lampoons Bush at White House Correspondent...
- War Costs Skyrocket
- Republicans Involved In Lobbyist Sex Scandal
- Chicken Hawks Come Home To Roost
- He Wasn't A Bush Appointee, Was He? I Can't Belie...
- Next they'll want us to eat chips and salsa....
- Time To Smell The Coffee
- Fueling their Anxiety
- A Gouging Market
- The power to do nothing about fuel economy
- Web sites I like
- There Is A God!
- "My job is to make decisions"
- The Rape of the Working Class
- For Rove, a time to panic?
- Bush does something right
- Fw: BREAKING: Iraq Debate Announced
- David Brock on New White House press secretary Ton...
- Bin Laden/China
- The Passion of George W. Bush
- A Prius in Every Pot - New York TimesThe New York ...
- Go West, Old Men - New York TimesThe New York Time...
- Priceless....
- Fw: Success! A major step towards satellite voting...
- Lyrics to Neil Young's "Let's Impeach the President"
- Rove lawyer: My client is not a target
- Meanwhile, a word about impeachment
- Bush, following and flip-flopping, takes a stand o...
- We told you so...
- Iraq: A Handy Rebuttal to the "We Have to Finish t...
- Top 10 Conservative Idiots
- 1000 Days To Go with FuckStick George
- Save The Internet
- Halliburton Project Not Completed; Just A Coincide...
- CSI: Trade Deficit - New York TimesThe New York Ti...
- On Waking Up Sleepless in the Middle of the Night
- Documentary: Giuliani Time
- Intelligence on Iran nuclear threat seen as inadeq...
- More Torture
- 2006 elections stakes: investigations of everything
- If Past Is Prologue, George Bush Is Becoming An In...
- Fitz vs. Turd Blossom?
- Lawyer: Rice Allegedly Leaked Defense Info
- AIPAC judge approve Rice subpoena
- The Great Revulsion - New York TimesThe New York T...
- Fw: Iraq Dispatches: Save the Internet
- Free Speech?
- Beware the Bombing of Iran
- Walking the White House Plank
- Attacking Iran: Are they nuts?
- Fw: Peace in Iraq Call-In Day Monday 4/24 - FCNL
- The Nuclear Power Beside Iraq
- $10 Billion per Month-Feeling Safer Yet?
- Bush's Nutty Nuclear Braggadocio
- The questions McClellan never answered
- The "Decider"
- Fw: Chinese President Comes to Washington: What Ne...
- Rumsfeld Shouldn't Be Fired. He Should Be Indicted.
- Recipe for Holy War: Add Two Nut Jobs and Stir
- A Supreme Mutiny
- RNC's Immigration Bamboozle
- Bombs That Would Backfire
- Scalia: The disorderly justice
- With Tax Break Expired, Middle Class Faces a Great...
- Neil Young Records "Impeach the President" Song
- Blair refuses to back Iran strike
- Documents Link Rumsfeld to Prisoner's Interrogation
- Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship
- Cracks in The Constitution?
- The slow-motion trap
- The Human Costs of Bombing Iran
- If You Liked the Iraq War, You'll Love the Iran War
- Problems mount from 9-11 fallout
- Reid fights back
- Bush's bluster
- Analysts Say a Nuclear Iran Is Years Away - New Yo...
- Seeds of a future coup?
- Stinkin Liberal State Offers Health Insurance To A...
- Are We Really Going To Nuke Iran?
- Bush: Idiot and Liar?
- Bush and the Constant State of War
- Cheney at the ballpark: They weren't yelling Bruuu...
- Now Powell Tells Us
- Yes He Would
- Bush/Cheney in the Crosshairs
- Phone-Jamming Records Point to White House
- Democrats . . . Si!
- THE IRAN PLANS
- A leak about the leak, but more questions than ans...
- An October Surprise?
- Bush Critics Alarmed over Reports of Possible Stri...
- When Will Democrats Break With Bush?
- Libby testimony shows a White House pattern of int...
- Republican Senator Says Bush, Cheney Should Explai...
- Fool Me Twice
- U.S. Considers Use of Nuclear Weapons Against Iran
- Cheney at center of effort to discredit
- Libby, Gonzales Provied More Grounds for Censure o...
-
▼
April
(137)
No comments:
Post a Comment