Why Rumsfeld Should Not Resign
By Greg Palast
The Guardian
Well, here they come: the wannabe Rommels, the gaggle of generals, safely retired, to lay siege to Donald Rumsfeld. This week, six of them have called for the Secretary of Defense's resignation.
Well, according to my watch, they're about four years too late -- and they still don't get it.
I know that most of my readers will be tickled pink that the bemedalled boys in crew cuts are finally ready to kick Rummy in the rump, in public. But to me, it just shows me that these boys still can't shoot straight.
It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who stood up in front of the UN and identified two mobile latrines as biological weapons labs, was it, General Powell?
It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who told us our next warning from Saddam could be a mushroom cloud, was it Condoleezza?
It wasn't Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld who declared that Al Qaeda and Saddam were going steady, was it, Mr. Cheney?
Yes, Rumsfeld is a swaggering bag of mendacious arrogance, a duplicitous chicken-hawk, yellow-bellied bully-boy and Tinker-Toy Napoleon -- but he didn't appoint himself Secretary of Defense.
Let me tell you a story about the Secretary of Defense you didn't read in the New York Times, related to me by General Jay Garner, the man our president placed in Baghdad as the US' first post-invasion viceroy.
Garner arrived in Kuwait City in March 2003 working under the mistaken notion that when George Bush called for democracy in Iraq, the President meant the Iraqis could choose their own government. Misunderstanding the President's true mission, General Garner called for Iraqis to hold elections within 90 days and for the U.S. to quickly pull troops out of the cities to a desert base. "It's their country," the General told me of the Iraqis. "And," he added, most ominously, "their oil."
Let's not forget: it's all about the oil. I showed Garner a 101-page plan for Iraq's economy drafted secretly by neo-cons at the State Department, Treasury and the Pentagon, calling for "privatization" (i.e. the sale) of "all state assets ... especially in the oil and oil-supporting industries." The General knew of the plans and he intended to shove it where the Iraqi sun don't shine. Garner planned what he called a "Big Tent" meeting of Iraqi tribal leaders to plan elections. By helping Iraqis establish their own multi-ethnic government -- and this was back when Sunnis, Shias and Kurds were on talking terms -- knew he could get the nation on its feet peacefully before a welcomed "liberation" turned into a hated "occupation."
But, Garner knew, a freely chosen coalition government would mean the death-knell for the neo-con oil-and-assets privatization grab.
On April 21, 2003, three years ago this month, the very night General Garner arrived in Baghdad, he got a call from Washington. It was Rumsfeld on the line. He told Garner, in so many words, "Don't unpack, Jack, you're fired."
Rummy replaced Garner, a man with years of on-the-ground experience in Iraq, with green-boots Paul Bremer, the Managing Director of Kissinger Associates. Bremer cancelled the Big Tent meeting of Iraqis and postponed elections for a year; then he issued 100 orders, like some tin-pot pasha, selling off Iraq's economy to U.S. and foreign operators, just as Rumsfeld's neo-con clique had desired.
Reading this, it sounds like I should applaud the six generals' call for Rumfeld's ouster. Forget it.
For a bunch of military hotshots, they sure can't shoot straight. They're wasting all their bullets on the decoy. They've gunned down the puppet instead of the puppeteers.
There's no way that Rumsfeld could have yanked General Garner from Baghdad without the word from The Bunker. Nothing moves or breathes or spits in the Bush Administration without Darth Cheney's growl of approval. And ultimately, it's the Commander-in-Chief who's chiefly in command.
Even the generals' complaint -- that Rumsfeld didn't give them enough troops -- was ultimately a decision of the cowboy from Crawford. (And by the way, the problem was not that we lacked troops -- the problem was that we lacked moral authority to occupy this nation. A million troops would not be enough -- the insurgents would just have more targets.)
President Bush is one lucky fella. I can imagine him today on the intercom with Cheney: "Well, pardner, looks like the game's up." And Cheney replies, "Hey, just hang the Rumsfeld dummy out the window until he's taken all their ammo."
When Bush and Cheney read about the call for Rumsfeld's resignation today, I can just hear George saying to Dick, "Mission Accomplished."
Generals, let me give you a bit of advice about choosing a target: It's the President, stupid.
Contributors
Links
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(1766)
-
▼
April
(137)
- The Rehabilitation of the Cold-War Liberal - New Y...
- The Criminal In Chief
- Colbert Lampoons Bush at White House Correspondent...
- War Costs Skyrocket
- Republicans Involved In Lobbyist Sex Scandal
- Chicken Hawks Come Home To Roost
- He Wasn't A Bush Appointee, Was He? I Can't Belie...
- Next they'll want us to eat chips and salsa....
- Time To Smell The Coffee
- Fueling their Anxiety
- A Gouging Market
- The power to do nothing about fuel economy
- Web sites I like
- There Is A God!
- "My job is to make decisions"
- The Rape of the Working Class
- For Rove, a time to panic?
- Bush does something right
- Fw: BREAKING: Iraq Debate Announced
- David Brock on New White House press secretary Ton...
- Bin Laden/China
- The Passion of George W. Bush
- A Prius in Every Pot - New York TimesThe New York ...
- Go West, Old Men - New York TimesThe New York Time...
- Priceless....
- Fw: Success! A major step towards satellite voting...
- Lyrics to Neil Young's "Let's Impeach the President"
- Rove lawyer: My client is not a target
- Meanwhile, a word about impeachment
- Bush, following and flip-flopping, takes a stand o...
- We told you so...
- Iraq: A Handy Rebuttal to the "We Have to Finish t...
- Top 10 Conservative Idiots
- 1000 Days To Go with FuckStick George
- Save The Internet
- Halliburton Project Not Completed; Just A Coincide...
- CSI: Trade Deficit - New York TimesThe New York Ti...
- On Waking Up Sleepless in the Middle of the Night
- Documentary: Giuliani Time
- Intelligence on Iran nuclear threat seen as inadeq...
- More Torture
- 2006 elections stakes: investigations of everything
- If Past Is Prologue, George Bush Is Becoming An In...
- Fitz vs. Turd Blossom?
- Lawyer: Rice Allegedly Leaked Defense Info
- AIPAC judge approve Rice subpoena
- The Great Revulsion - New York TimesThe New York T...
- Fw: Iraq Dispatches: Save the Internet
- Free Speech?
- Beware the Bombing of Iran
- Walking the White House Plank
- Attacking Iran: Are they nuts?
- Fw: Peace in Iraq Call-In Day Monday 4/24 - FCNL
- The Nuclear Power Beside Iraq
- $10 Billion per Month-Feeling Safer Yet?
- Bush's Nutty Nuclear Braggadocio
- The questions McClellan never answered
- The "Decider"
- Fw: Chinese President Comes to Washington: What Ne...
- Rumsfeld Shouldn't Be Fired. He Should Be Indicted.
- Recipe for Holy War: Add Two Nut Jobs and Stir
- A Supreme Mutiny
- RNC's Immigration Bamboozle
- Bombs That Would Backfire
- Scalia: The disorderly justice
- With Tax Break Expired, Middle Class Faces a Great...
- Neil Young Records "Impeach the President" Song
- Blair refuses to back Iran strike
- Documents Link Rumsfeld to Prisoner's Interrogation
- Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship
- Cracks in The Constitution?
- The slow-motion trap
- The Human Costs of Bombing Iran
- If You Liked the Iraq War, You'll Love the Iran War
- Problems mount from 9-11 fallout
- Reid fights back
- Bush's bluster
- Analysts Say a Nuclear Iran Is Years Away - New Yo...
- Seeds of a future coup?
- Stinkin Liberal State Offers Health Insurance To A...
- Are We Really Going To Nuke Iran?
- Bush: Idiot and Liar?
- Bush and the Constant State of War
- Cheney at the ballpark: They weren't yelling Bruuu...
- Now Powell Tells Us
- Yes He Would
- Bush/Cheney in the Crosshairs
- Phone-Jamming Records Point to White House
- Democrats . . . Si!
- THE IRAN PLANS
- A leak about the leak, but more questions than ans...
- An October Surprise?
- Bush Critics Alarmed over Reports of Possible Stri...
- When Will Democrats Break With Bush?
- Libby testimony shows a White House pattern of int...
- Republican Senator Says Bush, Cheney Should Explai...
- Fool Me Twice
- U.S. Considers Use of Nuclear Weapons Against Iran
- Cheney at center of effort to discredit
- Libby, Gonzales Provied More Grounds for Censure o...
-
▼
April
(137)
No comments:
Post a Comment