by John Nichols
President Bush told Vice President Cheney to tell the vice president's chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, to disclose highly classified information regarding Iraq intelligence in order to try and discredit legitimate criticism of the administration.
What's this? The latest line from proponents of impeachment?
No, according to court records that became available Thursday, it is what Libby testified was the scenario that played out before he began contacting reporters in an effort to undermine the reputation of former Ambassador Joe Wilson.
According to a National Journal report on the documents: "I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby testified to a federal grand jury that he had received 'approval from the President through the Vice President' to divulge portions of a National Intelligence Estimate regarding Saddam Hussein's purported efforts to develop nuclear weapons, according to the court papers. Libby was said to have testified that such presidential authorization to disclose classified information was 'unique in his recollection,' the court papers further said."
The Journal report, which is based on both the court papers and interviews with senior government officials familiar with the investigation of Libby's actions by Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor in the CIA leak case, suggests that a fast-and-loose approach to the release of classified information was authorized by Bush and Cheney before the war as part of an effort to "make the case" for the invasion of Iraq.
After the invasion, when Wilson raised questions about the validity of claims made by the president, the Journal report suggests that the gloves came off, and the weapon of choice was classified information.
"Bush and Cheney authorized the release of the information regarding the NIE (National Intelligence Estimate) in the summer of 2003, according to court documents, as part of a damage-control effort undertaken only days after former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV alleged in an op-ed in The New York Times that claims by Bush that Saddam Hussein had attempted to procure uranium from the African nation of Niger were most likely a hoax."
The White House initial response Thursday was to refuse to comment on Libby's testimony, which has called into serious question the president's October, 2003, assertion that: "I don't know of anyone in my administration who has leaked. If somebody did leak classified information, I'd like to know it, and we'll take the appropriate action."
But if the president is not now in a position to take appropriate action, members of Congress are.
U.S. Representative Maurice Hinchey, D-New York, who has been the most determined Congressional watchdog with regard to the administration's misuse of intelligence information, says that, "If what Scooter Libby said to the grand jury is true, then this latest development clearly reveals yet again that the CIA leak case goes much deeper than the disclosure of a CIA agent's identity to the press. The heart and motive of this case is about the deliberate attempt at the highest levels of this administration to discredit those who were publicly revealing that the White House lied about its uranium claims leading up to the war. The Bush Administration knew that Iraq had not sought uranium from Africa for a nuclear weapon, yet they went around telling the Congress, the country, and the world just the opposite. When Ambassador Joseph Wilson, Valerie Wilson's husband, publicly spoke out with proof that the administration was not telling the truth on uranium, the administration engaged in an orchestrated plot, which now reportedly includes President Bush, to discredit Ambassador Wilson and dismiss any notion that they had lied about pre-war intelligence."
Hinchey, one of the rare members of the House who has made it his business to monitor and police abuses of executive powers, wrote the 1999 amendment to intelligence reauthorization legislation that forced the declassification of documents that revealed the role played by former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and other members of the Nixon administration in the illegal 1973 overthrow of Chilean President Salvador Allende.
The congressman is one of 33 cosponsors of Representative John Conyers' resolution calling for the creation of a select committee to investigate, among other issues, the Bush administration's manipulation of pre-war and retaliating against critics. That committee would be charged with making recommendations regarding grounds for possible impeachment, which would, of course, require a finding that high crimes and misdemeanors had been committed by the president and vice president.
Hinchey's says that Libby's testimony adds to the mounting body of evidence that rules, regulations and laws have been bent far beyond the breaking point.
"It is an absolute disgrace to the institution of the presidency that President Bush authorized members of his administration to disclose select parts of highly classified information from a National Intelligence Estimate in order to make political advances and gain public support," says Hinchey. "How dare President Bush and Vice President Cheney say they want to prosecute those who leaked the NSA domestic surveillance program when they themselves authorized the disclosure of information from some of the most highly sensitive documents in the government. The White House opposes leaks when the disclosed information hurts them politically, but supports leaks when information advances their political cause."
Hinchey has for months been urging Fitzgerald to officially expand his investigation to include an examination of the motives behind the leaks by Libby, focusing in particular on the question of whether the administration's intent was to discredit Ambassador Wilson's revelation that Iraq had never sought uranium from Niger or other African countries. If that is proven to be the case, Hinchey has argued, "President Bush and other top members of his administration knowingly lied about uranium to the Congress, which is a crime."
"It is my belief, as well as the belief of my 39 House colleagues who signed my original letter to Special Counsel Fitzgerald, that he has the authority and obligation to expand his investigation to investigate the lies about uranium, which are the true heart of this case," Hinchey explained Thursday, in a statement outlining his intention to step up efforts to press for the expansion of the investigation.
The congressman is laying down the line that members of Congress, be they members of the Democratic opposition or honest Republicans who are beginning to recognize the extent to which they have been deceived by Bush, Cheney and their aides, will need to embrace at a moment when the administration and its media echo chamber will be doing everything in their power to constrain Fitzgerald's investigation.
Says Hinchey: "The heart of the CIA leak case cannot and must not be ignored."
Contributors
Links
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(1766)
-
▼
April
(137)
- The Rehabilitation of the Cold-War Liberal - New Y...
- The Criminal In Chief
- Colbert Lampoons Bush at White House Correspondent...
- War Costs Skyrocket
- Republicans Involved In Lobbyist Sex Scandal
- Chicken Hawks Come Home To Roost
- He Wasn't A Bush Appointee, Was He? I Can't Belie...
- Next they'll want us to eat chips and salsa....
- Time To Smell The Coffee
- Fueling their Anxiety
- A Gouging Market
- The power to do nothing about fuel economy
- Web sites I like
- There Is A God!
- "My job is to make decisions"
- The Rape of the Working Class
- For Rove, a time to panic?
- Bush does something right
- Fw: BREAKING: Iraq Debate Announced
- David Brock on New White House press secretary Ton...
- Bin Laden/China
- The Passion of George W. Bush
- A Prius in Every Pot - New York TimesThe New York ...
- Go West, Old Men - New York TimesThe New York Time...
- Priceless....
- Fw: Success! A major step towards satellite voting...
- Lyrics to Neil Young's "Let's Impeach the President"
- Rove lawyer: My client is not a target
- Meanwhile, a word about impeachment
- Bush, following and flip-flopping, takes a stand o...
- We told you so...
- Iraq: A Handy Rebuttal to the "We Have to Finish t...
- Top 10 Conservative Idiots
- 1000 Days To Go with FuckStick George
- Save The Internet
- Halliburton Project Not Completed; Just A Coincide...
- CSI: Trade Deficit - New York TimesThe New York Ti...
- On Waking Up Sleepless in the Middle of the Night
- Documentary: Giuliani Time
- Intelligence on Iran nuclear threat seen as inadeq...
- More Torture
- 2006 elections stakes: investigations of everything
- If Past Is Prologue, George Bush Is Becoming An In...
- Fitz vs. Turd Blossom?
- Lawyer: Rice Allegedly Leaked Defense Info
- AIPAC judge approve Rice subpoena
- The Great Revulsion - New York TimesThe New York T...
- Fw: Iraq Dispatches: Save the Internet
- Free Speech?
- Beware the Bombing of Iran
- Walking the White House Plank
- Attacking Iran: Are they nuts?
- Fw: Peace in Iraq Call-In Day Monday 4/24 - FCNL
- The Nuclear Power Beside Iraq
- $10 Billion per Month-Feeling Safer Yet?
- Bush's Nutty Nuclear Braggadocio
- The questions McClellan never answered
- The "Decider"
- Fw: Chinese President Comes to Washington: What Ne...
- Rumsfeld Shouldn't Be Fired. He Should Be Indicted.
- Recipe for Holy War: Add Two Nut Jobs and Stir
- A Supreme Mutiny
- RNC's Immigration Bamboozle
- Bombs That Would Backfire
- Scalia: The disorderly justice
- With Tax Break Expired, Middle Class Faces a Great...
- Neil Young Records "Impeach the President" Song
- Blair refuses to back Iran strike
- Documents Link Rumsfeld to Prisoner's Interrogation
- Desert Rats Leave The Sinking Ship
- Cracks in The Constitution?
- The slow-motion trap
- The Human Costs of Bombing Iran
- If You Liked the Iraq War, You'll Love the Iran War
- Problems mount from 9-11 fallout
- Reid fights back
- Bush's bluster
- Analysts Say a Nuclear Iran Is Years Away - New Yo...
- Seeds of a future coup?
- Stinkin Liberal State Offers Health Insurance To A...
- Are We Really Going To Nuke Iran?
- Bush: Idiot and Liar?
- Bush and the Constant State of War
- Cheney at the ballpark: They weren't yelling Bruuu...
- Now Powell Tells Us
- Yes He Would
- Bush/Cheney in the Crosshairs
- Phone-Jamming Records Point to White House
- Democrats . . . Si!
- THE IRAN PLANS
- A leak about the leak, but more questions than ans...
- An October Surprise?
- Bush Critics Alarmed over Reports of Possible Stri...
- When Will Democrats Break With Bush?
- Libby testimony shows a White House pattern of int...
- Republican Senator Says Bush, Cheney Should Explai...
- Fool Me Twice
- U.S. Considers Use of Nuclear Weapons Against Iran
- Cheney at center of effort to discredit
- Libby, Gonzales Provied More Grounds for Censure o...
-
▼
April
(137)
No comments:
Post a Comment